Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:29:11.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the development of the fleece and follicle population in Suffolk sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Marca Burns
Marca Burns
Affiliation:
Wool Industries Research Association, Headingley, Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Observations were made on four Suffolk lambs from birth to 14 months of age, wool and skin samples being taken periodically. The lambs were on a high nutritional plane and grew well throughout the experiment.

1. There is good agreement between estimates of growth based on body weight, calculated surface area, and expansion of tattooed squares.

2. Fibre Type Arrays were Valley or Plain.

3. Benzene tests showed considerable medullation in the fleeces of all the lambs, mainly in the posterior parts. There were practically none on the shoulder.

4. The weight of keratin produced daily per unit area of skin reached or exceeded the figure given as maximal by Galpin (1948) in only six samples, of which four were grown prior to 1 month old.

5. The follicle population completes its development early, only a few secondary follicles being added after birth. The definitive S/P ratio is 5/, which is similar to the Leicester, and lower than in the Romney breed. The follicle density, although high at birth, is lower than in the Romney or Leicester, after 9 months old. Both S/P ratio and follicle density are higher than in the Blackface breed.

6. The transitory black colour of the birth-coat of Suffolk lambs is due to pigmentation of the tips of many fibres; this may affect any type of fibre from haloes and sickles to histerotrichs. With very few exceptions all follicles cease to produce pigmented fibre at or shortly after birth of the lamb. Large amoebic melanoblasts are present in the skin.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 1954 , pp. 86 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burns, M. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. & Auber, L. (1951). J. Comp. Path. 61 (1), 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. B. (1943). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 164Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Hardy, M. (1947). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 215.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1933). J. Text. Inst. 24, T 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. S. & Hamada, M. K. O. (1952). Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. B, 64, 462.Google Scholar
Galpin, N. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galpin, N. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. & Kermack, K. A. (1950). Biometrika, xxxvii, 30.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Ritzman, E. G. & Colovos, N. F. (1930). Circ. Univ. N.H. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 32.Google Scholar
Slen, S. B. & Whiting, F. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar