Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:29:32.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of roughages for sheep I. The relationship between the gross digestible energy and the chemical composition of hays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. M. Walker  and
W. R. Hepburn
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
W. R. Hepburn
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The relationship existing between the gross digestible energy content and the chemical composition of 24 hays has been studied with nine Cheviot wether lambs over a period of 8 months.

2. Each hay was fed to a group of three lambs for a 10-day preliminary and 10-day collection period. Faeces and urine were collected in metabolism crates.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , February 1955 , pp. 298 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armitage, E. R., Ashworth, R. de B. & Ferguson, W. S. (1948). J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 67, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arni, P. & Walker, D. M. (1953). Unpublished data.Google Scholar
A.O.A.C. (1950). Official and Tentative Methods of Analysis, 7th ed.Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Axelsson, J. (1938). Tierernährung, 10, 238.Google Scholar
Axelsson, J. (1940). Tierernährung, 12, 414.Google Scholar
Axelsson, J. (1949). Ann. Roy. Agric. Coll. Sweden, 16, 84.Google Scholar
Axelsson, J. (1950). Ann. Roy. Agric. Coll. Sweden, 17, 320.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. & Dijkstra, N. D. (1938). Versl. Rijkslandb Proefsts.,'s Grav 44 C, 529.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. (1939). Sci. Agric. 19, 345.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Forshaw, R. (1940). J. Nutr. 19, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Whiting, F. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, J. (1946). Trop. Agriculture, Trin., 23, 4.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. H., Matrone, G. & Maynard, L. A. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, S. (1950). Ann. Roy. Agric. Coll. Sweden, 17, 396.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. (1948). Agric. Progr. 23, 129.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. M. & Garrigus, W. P. (1950 a). J. Anim. Sci. 9, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, R. M. & Garrigus, W. P. (1950 b). J. Anim. Sci. 9, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, E. G. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, E. G. (1950). Agric. Progr. 25, 39.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. S., Mitchell, H. H. & Kammlade, W. G. (1928). Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 303.Google Scholar
Homb, T. (1946). Norg. Landbrukskogskole, Foringsforsøkene 61. beretning.Google Scholar
Homb, T. (1952). Norg. Landbrukskogskole, Foringsforsøkene 71. beretning.Google Scholar
Jarl, F. (1938). Nord. Jordbr Forskn, 20, 1.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, R. A. & Reid, S. G. (1952). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 3, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, R. J. (1943). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 25A, 137.Google Scholar
Lofgreen, G. P. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1943). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 25A, 152.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. G. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. G. & Jenkins, S. H. (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. & Loughlin, T. G. (1949). J. Agric. Res. 78, 389.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1947). Feeds of the World, their Digestibility and Composition.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H., Lucas, H. L., Pavlech, H. M. & Cipolloni, M. A. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. H., Lucas, H. L., Cipolloni, M. A. & Pavlech, H. M. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, R. W., Bratzler, J. W., James, W. H., Tillman, A. D. & Meek, D. C. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 475.Google Scholar
Thomas, B. & Armstrong, D. G. (1950). Agriculture, 57, 210.Google Scholar
Thomas, B. & Ibbotson, C. F. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, R. & Boyd, J. (1953). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 4, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, T. B. (1927). Bull. Minist. Agric, Lond., no. 48. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1942). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 124. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1948). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1952). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar