Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:53:38.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nutrition of the bacon pig: VI. The minimum level of protein intake consistent with quick growth and satisfactory carcass quality (Part III)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Woodman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge

Extract

It has been shown that a diet supplying, in addition to barley meal, weatings and 2% of lucerne meal, 5% of fish meal up to 90 lb. live weight, 2% from 90 to 150 lb. and no protein-rich food from 150 lb. to slaughter at about 200 lb. live weight, will give almost as good results, from the standpoints of mean daily live-weight increase and efficiency of food conversion over the whole period as one that provides 10% of fish meal from weaning to 150 lb. and 5% of a protein-rich food such as ex. soya bean meal from 150 to 200 lb. live weight. The small differences noted in the present trial were not statistically significant. It is true that the reduction of the fish meal supply to 5% or less retards to a significant extent the rate of growth up to 90 lb. live weight, but this initial setback, according to the results of this and the writers' previous investigations, tends to be wiped out during the later stages of feeding.

Further, a diet supplying, in addition to cereal, weatings and a small proportion of lucerne meal, as little as 2% of fish meal up to 90 lb. live weight and no protein-rich food at all thereafter has been shown to give results that are not seriously inferior, particularly when viewed against the background of wartime conditions, to those obtained on the standard diet. In this treatment, the protein required for growth beyond 90 lb. live weight was supplied by a diet of barley meal and weatings reinforced by 2% of lucerne meal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Woodman, H. E., Evans, R. E., Turpitt, W. G. & Callow, E. H. (1939). J. agric. Sci. 29, 115.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Evans, R. E., Callow, E. H. & Wishart, J. (1936). J. agric. Sci. 26, 546.Google Scholar