Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:03:49.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No-tillage and dry ploughing compared with puddling for wet-season rice on an alluvial sandy clay–loam in eastern India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. R. Mahata ,
H. S. Sen ,
S. K. Pradhan  and
L. N. Mandal
K. R. Mahata
Affiliation:
Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India
H. S. Sen
Affiliation:
Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India
S. K. Pradhan
Affiliation:
Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India
L. N. Mandal
Affiliation:
Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

No-tillage and dry ploughing were compared with puddling under identical cultivation conditions for their effect on growth and yield of wet-season rice. The experiment was conducted on an alluvial sandy clay–loam soil over 5 years (1978–82) at Cuttack, India. In the preceding dry season, each plot was split into two halves for growing dry-season crops, with and without tillage. Growth of rice seedlings without applying N to the seed bed was faster and more vigorous after puddling, as shown by greater shoot and root weight per hill and a higher shoot:root ratio, and remained so until maturity. This was reflected in earlier flowering and maturity, followed by greater grain and straw yields. These results are attributed to the ability of the roots to obtain more N from the puddled soil.

Under high water table conditions, extractable and soluble N in the root zone were not much influenced by tillage treatments. Grain and straw yields after no-tillage were similar to those produced by dry ploughing but smaller than those produced by puddling, although the differences were not significant in some years.

Soil strength measured at the end of the rice-growing season in 1980 and 1981 was significantly greater after continuous no-tillage. The decreasing trend in grain and straw yield and number of panicle-bearing tillers/m2 from 1980 onwards after continuous no-tillage, was associated with increasing soil strength. The results suggest that, where percolation losses of water and nutrients are small, puddling, which is capital intensive and detrimental to soil structure, could be replaced by notillage accompanied by suitable N and weed management. However, continuous no-tillage is not recommended for a soil with a lower clay content because the soil will gradually harden with time.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 114 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hasegawa, S., Thangaraj, M. & O'Toole, J. C. (1985). Root behaviour: field and laboratory studies for rice and non-rice crops. In Soil Physics and Rice, Philippines, pp. 383–395. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.Google Scholar
Kemper, W. D. & Rosenau, R. C. (1984). Soil cohesion as aflected by time and water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 1001–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R. (1985). Tillage in lowland rice-based cropping systems. In Soil Physics and Rice, Philippines, pp. 283–307. Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Mohanty, S. K., Patnaik, S. & Whitting, L. D. (1974). Characteristics of some rice growing soils of India. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 22, 357–364.Google Scholar
Onken, A. B. & Sunderman, H. D. (1977). Colorimetric determination of exchangeable ammonium, urea, nitrate and nitrite in a single soil extract. Agronomy Journal 69, 49–53.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. J. (1976). Effect of artificial weathering cycles on the structural stability of a dispersed silt soil. Journal of Soil Science 27, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, P. A. (1973). Puddling tropical rice soils. I. Growth and nutritional aspects. Soil Science 115, 149–158.Google Scholar
Sharma, P. K. & De Datta, S. K. (1985). Puddling influences on soil, rice development and growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 1451–1457.Google Scholar
Sims, J. R. & Jackson, G. D. (1971). Rapid analysis of soil nitrate with chromotropic acid. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 35, 603–606.Google Scholar
Sur, H. S., Prihar, S. S. & Jalota, S. K. (1981). Effect of rice-wheat and maize-wheat rotations on water transmission and wheat root development in a sandy loam of the Punjab, India, Soil Tillage Research 1, 361–371.Google Scholar
Utomo, W. H. & Dexter, A. R. (1981). Age hardening of agricultural top soils. Journal of Soil Science 32, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utomo, W. H. & Dexter, A. R. (1982). Changes in soil aggregate water stability induced by wetting and drying cycles in non-saturated soil. Journal of Soil Science 33, 623–637.Google Scholar