Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:33:10.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitrogen studies in a coffee soil I. Seasonal trends of natural soil nitrate and ammonia in relation to crop growth, soil moisture and rainfall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. B. D. Robinson
J. B. D. Robinson
Affiliation:
Coffee Services, Department of Agriculture, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The general seasonal trends of top-soil nitrate and ammonia-N, and growth of the coffee tree are described for conditions of both soil and climate which are representative of a large proportion of the coffee-producing area in Kenya.

2. When rainfall is heavy and persistent at the beginning of a rains period soil nitrate-N levels decrease rapidly, partly because of leaching losses and partly through uptake by the crop. Under conditions of rainfall and cropping similar to those described for the first half of 1954, the flush of nitrate-N in the early part of the rains will not be detected under field conditions. When the onset of the rainfall season is more gentle and substantial water movement through the upper part of the soil profile does not take place, for example, Short Rains, 1954, nitrate-N values do not decrease rapidly and there is indirect evidence of the stimulatory effect of this type of rainfall on nitrate-N formation in a remoistened field soil.

3. Rapid and substantial build-up of nitrate-N is shown to take place during intervening dry weather between the rainfall periods. This is particularly marked in the top 6 in. of the soil profile and is attributed to nitrate-N formation in the absence of leaching losses; to a decreased rate of uptake by the coffee tree in the absence of vigorous growth and to the physical movement of nitrate-N upwards into the top-soil.

It may be inferred from the results that alternate periods of rain and sunshine, rather than continuous heavy rain, will favour high soil nitrate-N levels and a more satisfactory nitrogen nutrition of the coffee tree.

4. During periods of very low soil moisture ammonia-N builds up in the dry top-soil.

5. The sharp peak and rapid decline in the rate of coffee growth during the Long Rains period coincides with very low soil nitrate-N values although climatologically conditions for continued growth are still excellent. This suggests that low available soil nitrate -N may be at least partially responsible for this early and rapid decline in the growth rate.

6. In the light of observed trends in nitrate-N and coffee growth the timing of fertilizer nitrogen application to mature coffee has been altered. During the Long Rains split applications are recommended with the particular object of maintaining a supply of readily available nitrate-N in the soil. An additional and supplementary fertilizer nitrogen application is also suggested in the Short Rains period.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , December 1960 , pp. 333 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1958/1959). Ann. Rep. Coffee Research Services, Kenya, p. 32.Google Scholar
Birch, H. F. (1958). Plant & Soil, 10, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, H. F. (1959). Plant & Soil, 11, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, W. E. de B. (1937). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 5, 264.Google Scholar
Gethin-Jones, G. H. (1949). Comm. Bu. Soil Sci., Tech. Comm. no. 46, 92.Google Scholar
Greenland, D. J. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, G. ap (1951). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 19, 1.Google Scholar
Hageszieker, F. (1957). Plant & Soil, 9, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, F. (1946). Trop. Agriculture, Trin., 23, 40.Google Scholar
Nutman, F. J. (1933). Emp. J. Exp. Agric, 1, 271.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C. & Jones, P. A. (1954). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 22, 23.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, H. C. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. L. (1938). J. Agric. Sci. 28, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D., Ailen, M. de V. & Gacoka, P. (1959). Analyst, 84, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, E. M. & McKaig, N. Jun. (1939). Soil Sci. 47, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, F. D. & Snell, C. T. (1953). Colorimetric Methods of Analysis, 3rd ed., p. 799.Google Scholar
Yuen, S. H. & Pollard, A. G. (1953). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 4, 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar