Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:30:40.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes: Parts V–XI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. R. Barnicoat ,
P. F. Murray ,
E. M. Roberts  and
G. S. Wilson
C. R. Barnicoat
Affiliation:
Massey Agricultural College, University of New Zealand, Palmerston North
P. F. Murray
Affiliation:
Massey Agricultural College, University of New Zealand, Palmerston North
E. M. Roberts
Affiliation:
Massey Agricultural College, University of New Zealand, Palmerston North
G. S. Wilson
Affiliation:
Massey Agricultural College, University of New Zealand, Palmerston North
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Experiments on the milking qualities of New Zealand Romney ewes, maintained at liberal standards of grazing and at different planes of nutrition under stall-feeding conditions, were described in four earlier papers published in this Journal (Barnicoat, Logan & Grant, 1949).

In the meantime several other original papers in this field have appeared: Coop (1950) studied the effect of certain factors including milk intake on the growth and development of lambs of various breeds of sheep in the South Island of New Zealand; Barnicoat (1952) discussed some practical applications of the work; Owen (1953), employing a modified technique for measuring milk yields of Welsh hill ewes, found that the correlations between lamb gains and estimated milk yields were of a similar order to those established elsewhere under easier conditions of farming; Thomson & Thomson (1953) carried out experiments with Cheviot ewes fed indoors, and their results support the viewpoint that adequate nutrition in the final stages of pregnancy is of paramount importance; and Gill & Thomson (1953) discussed the significance of milk yield of ewes under farming conditions in Great Britain which contrast widely with conditions pertaining to the district in which the experiments described in this series of papers were conducted.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , October 1956 , pp. 9 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aritman, C. (1946). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 14, 23.Google Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R. (1952). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 12, 115.Google Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. & Grant, A. I. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, Part I, p. 44; Part II, p: 47; Part III, p. 237; Part IV, p. 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. Quoted by Snedecor, (1946) Statistical Methods, p. 249.Google Scholar
Barton, R. A., Phillips, T. O. & Clarke, E. A. (1949). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 9, 66.Google Scholar
Bonsma, F. N. (1944). Fmg in S. Afr. 19, 311, 395.Google Scholar
Bonsma, H. C. & Engela, D. J. (1941). Fmg in S. Afr. 16, 321.Google Scholar
Bosman, S. W. & Bonsma, H. C. (1944). Fmg in S. Afr. 19, 573.Google Scholar
Boutwell, R. K., Geyer, R. P., Elvehgem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1943). J. Nutr. 26, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, E. A., Barton, R. A. & Wilson, G. S. (1953). Massey Agricultural College Publication.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J. C. & Thomson, W. (1953). Brit. J. Nutr. 7, 263.Google Scholar
Godden, W. & Puddy, C. A. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, L. N. (1946). Biomet. Bull. 2, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, L. N. & Terrill, C. E. (1945). J. Anim. Sci. 4, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1931). J. Agric. Res. 42, 853.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. & Dassart, P. (1954). Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol. 62 (3), 17.Google Scholar
Maynard, L. A. (1947). Animal Nutrition, 2nd ed.McGraw-Hill. (References on p. 426.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedig, R. E. & Iddings, E. J. (1919). J. Agric. Res. 17, 19.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. (1953). Nature, Land., 172, 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritzman, E. G. (1917). J. Agric. Res. 11, 607.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1950). Statistical Methods, 4th ed.Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cox, G. M. (1935). Res. Bull. Ia Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 180.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. & Thomson, A. M. (1953). Brit. Agric. Bull. 6, 154.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, F., Slen, S. B. & Bezeau, L. M. (1952). Sci. Agric. 32, 365.Google Scholar