Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:14:49.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methane consumption potential of soybean-wheat, maize-wheat and maize-gram cropping systems under conventional and no-tillage agriculture in a tropical vertisol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2020

Bharati Kollah ,
Mahendra Bakoriya ,
Garima Dubey ,
Rakesh Parmar ,
J. Somasundaram ,
Abhay Shirale ,
S. C. Gupta ,
A. K. Patra  and
Santosh Ranjan Mohanty Open the ORCID record for Santosh Ranjan Mohanty [Opens in a new window]
Bharati Kollah
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
Mahendra Bakoriya
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
Garima Dubey
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
Rakesh Parmar
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
J. Somasundaram
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
Abhay Shirale
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
S. C. Gupta
Affiliation:
Soil Science & Agricultural Chemistry, RAK College of Agriculture, Sehore, Madhya Pradesh466001, India
A. K. Patra
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
Santosh Ranjan Mohanty*
Affiliation:
ICAR Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh462038, India
*
Author for correspondence: Santosh Ranjan Mohanty, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Methane (CH4) consumption in agricultural soil is imperative for the mitigation of climate change. However, the effect of tillage and cropping systems on CH4 consumption is less studied. Experiments were carried out in Madhya Pradesh, India with soybean-wheat (SW), maize-wheat (MW) and maize-gram (MG) cropping systems under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). Soybean/maize was cultivated during the kharif season (July–October) and wheat/chickpea in the rabi season (October–March) for 9 years consecutively. Soil samples were collected during vegetative growth stages of soybean and maize from different cropping systems. Methane consumption, the abundance of methanotrophs as particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoA) gene copies, soil and crop parameters were estimated. Methane consumption rate was higher in NT and upper soil layer (0–5 cm) than CT and 5–15 cm depth. Methane consumption rate k ranged from 0.35 to 0.56 μg CH4 consumed/g soil/d in the order of MW>SW>MG in 0–5 cm. The abundance of pmoA gene copies ranged from 43 × 104/g soil to 13 × 104/g soil and was highest in MW-NT and lowest in MG-CT. Available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were higher in 0–5 cm than in 5–15 cm depth. Soil and plant parameters and abundance of pmoA genes correlated significantly and positively with CH4 consumption rate. No-tillage stimulated CH4 consumption compared to CT irrespective of cropping system and CH4 consumption potential was highest in MW and lowest in MG. However, the magnitude of the positive effect of NT towards CH4 consumption was higher in SW and MG than MW.

Keywords

Agricultural practicemethanepmoA genesoil
Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 158 , Issue 1-2 , March 2020 , pp. 38 - 46
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcón, R, Hernández-Plaza, E, Navarrete, L, Sánchez, MJ, Escudero, A, Hernanz, JL, Sánchez-Giron, V and Sánchez, AM (2018) Effects of no-tillage and non-inversion tillage on weed community diversity and crop yield over nine years in a Mediterranean cereal-legume cropland. Soil and Tillage Research 179, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Canqui, H and Ruis, SJ (2018) No-tillage and soil physical environment. Geoderma 326, 164–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinseu, E, Dougill, A and Stringer, L (2019) Why do smallholder farmers dis-adopt conservation agriculture? Insights from Malawi. Land Degradation & Development 30(5), 533–543.10.1002/ldr.3190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, R (1996) Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO). Microbiological Reviews 60, 609–640.10.1128/MMBR.60.4.609-640.1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, EA and Kanter, D (2014) Inventories and scenarios of nitrous oxide emissions. Environmental Research Letters 9, 105012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutaur, L and Verchot, LV (2007) A global inventory of the soil CH4 sink. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 21, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanway, JJ and Heidel, H (1952) Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa state college soil testing laboratory. Iowa Agriculture 57, 1–31.Google Scholar
He, W, Yang, JY, Drury, CF, Smith, WN, Grant, BB, He, P, Qian, B, Zhou, W and Hoogenboom, G (2018) Estimating the impacts of climate change on crop yields and N2O emissions for conventional and no-tillage in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Agricultural Systems 159, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, PR, Sayre, K and Gupta, R (2008) The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 363, 543–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husson, O, Brunet, A, Babre, D, Charpentier, H, Durand, M and Sarthou, J-P (2018) Conservation agriculture systems alter the electrical characteristics (Eh, pH and EC) of four soil types in France. Soil and Tillage Research 176, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihaka, R and Gentleman, R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5, 299–314.Google Scholar
IPCC (2007) Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jat, RA, Wani, SP and Sahrawat, KL (2012) Conservation agriculture in the semi-arid tropics: prospects and problems. Advances in Agronomy 117, 191–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassam, A, Friedrich, T and Derpsch, R (2019) Global spread of conservation agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies 76, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, S (2009) The quest for atmospheric methane oxidizers in forest soils. Environmental microbiology reports 1, 336–346.10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00047.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lal, R (2019) Promoting “4 Per Thousand” and “Adapting African Agriculture” by south-south cooperation: conservation agriculture and sustainable intensification. Soil and Tillage Research 188, 27–34.10.1016/j.still.2017.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Mer, J and Roger, P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. European Journal of Soil Biology 37, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, WL and Norvell, WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper1. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancinelli, RL (1995) The regulation of methane oxidation in soil. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 49, 581–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangalassery, S, Mooney, SJ, Sparkes, DL, Fraser, WT and Sjögersten, S (2015) Impacts of zero tillage on soil enzyme activities, microbial characteristics and organic matter functional chemistry in temperate soils. European Journal of Soil Biology 68, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, SR, Bodelier, PL, Floris, V and Conrad, R (2006) Differential effects of nitrogenous fertilizers on methane-consuming microbes in rice field and forest soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72, 1346–1354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohanty, S, Kollah, B, Chaudhary, RS, Singh, AB and Singh, M (2015) Methane uptake in tropical soybean–wheat agroecosystem under different fertilizer regimes. Environmental Earth Sciences 74, 5049–5061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, SR, Bandeppa, GS, Dubey, G, Ahirwar, U, Patra, AK and Bharati, K (2017) Methane oxidation in response to iron reduction-oxidation metabolism in tropical soils. European Journal of Soil Biology 78, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, EG, Dlugokencky, EJ, Manning, MR, Lowry, D, Fisher, RE, France, JL, Michel, SE, Miller, JB, White, JWC and Vaughn, B (2016) Rising atmospheric methane: 2007–2014 growth and isotopic shift. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 30, 1356–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, MR, van Es, HM, Schindelbeck, R, Ristow, AJ and Ryan, M (2018) No-till and cropping system diversification improve soil health and crop yield. Geoderma 328, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, SR (1954) Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Peng, Y, Wang, G, Li, F, Yang, G, Fang, K, Liu, L, Qin, S, Zhang, D, Zhou, G and Fang, H (2019) A unimodal response of soil methane consumption to increasing nitrogen additions. Environmental Science & Technology 58, 4150–4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittock, AB (2017) Climate Change: Turning up the Heat. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, S (2003) Environmental impacts of modern agricultural technology diffusion in Bangladesh: an analysis of farmers’ perceptions and their determinants. Journal of Environmental Management 68, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, MH, Okubo, A, Sugiyama, S and Mayland, HF (2008) Physical, chemical and microbiological properties of an Andisol as related to land use and tillage practice. Soil and Tillage Research 101, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, JL and Liebig, MA (2016) Soil pH and exchangeable cation responses to tillage and fertilizer in dryland cropping systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 47, 2396–2404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R, Gravuer, K, Bossange, AV, Mitchell, J and Scow, K (2018) Long-term use of cover crops and no-till shift soil microbial community life strategies in agricultural soil. PLoS ONE 13, e0192953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Si, P, Liu, E, He, W, Sun, Z, Dong, W, Yan, C and Zhang, Y (2018) Effect of no-tillage with straw mulch and conventional tillage on soil organic carbon pools in Northern China. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 64, 398–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, JL and Doran, JW (1996) Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. In Methods for Assessing Soil Quality p. Soil Science Society of America Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, pp. 169–185.Google Scholar
Subbiah, B and Asija, GL (1956) Alkaline permanganate method of available nitrogen determination. Current Science 25, 259.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Mwila, M and Rusinamhodzi, L (2013) Conservation agriculture in eastern and southern provinces of Zambia: long-term effects on soil quality and maize productivity. Soil and Tillage Research 126, 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, A and Black, IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid extraction method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, FS and Olsen, SR (1965) Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal 29, 677–678.10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, D, Xiao, S, Ye, Y, Zhang, W, He, X and Wang, K (2019) Microbial biomass, metabolic functional diversity, and activity are affected differently by tillage disturbance and maize planting in a typical karst calcareous soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments 19, 809–821.10.1007/s11368-018-2101-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X, Wang, C and Xu, K (2017) Response of soil CH4 fluxes to stimulated nitrogen deposition in a temperate deciduous forest in northern China: a 5-year nitrogen addition experiment. European Journal of Soil Biology 82, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Li, X, Gregorich, EG, McLaughlin, NB, Zhang, X, Guo, Y, Liang, A, Fan, R and Sun, B (2018) No-tillage with continuous maize cropping enhances soil aggregation and organic carbon storage in Northeast China. Geoderma 330, 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar