Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:20:06.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A meta-analysis of sugarbeet yield responses to nitrogen fertilizer measured in England since 1980

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2009

K. W. JAGGARD ,
A. QI  and
M. J. ARMSTRONG
K. W. JAGGARD*
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Research Centre, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP, UK
A. QI
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Research Centre, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP, UK
M. J. ARMSTRONG
Affiliation:
Armstrong Fisher Limited, 8 Barn Owl Close, Langtoft, Peterborough PE6 9RG, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The data from 161 experiments testing the response of sugarbeet yield to nitrogen fertilizer were assembled in a database. Three commonly used N response models (Mitscherlich, linear plus exponential and bilinear) were fitted to each set of fertilizer application rates and the models were then assessed on how well they fitted all the data. The bilinear model was judged the most appropriate model for fitting to beet root yield adjusted to a standard sugar concentration. The optimum N application was determined for each experiment. Attempts were then made to correlate these optima with factors associated with the site and the season (winter rainfall, soil texture, amount of soil mineral N at sowing, sowing date, summer rainfall and harvest date). Beet grown in peat soil never responded significantly to any applied N fertilizer and neither did crops treated recently with organic manure supplying large amounts (>150 kg N/ha) of available N. Variation in N optima between other sites could not be explained by factors that could be used to predict the amount of fertilizer to apply. In the absence of any method to make reliable predictions of variations in fertilizer need, the most economical uniform amount was calculated. At present fertilizer prices and beet values, this amount is between 100 and 110 kg N/ha. It is possible that the N fertilizer need of beet crops does not vary predictably because this variation is an experimental error. The crop needs a reasonably standard application of fertilizer because much N has to be taken up early in the crop's development, rapidly and predominantly from the topsoil that, at this stage, contains most of the small fibrous root system.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 147 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 287 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, M. F., Armstrong, M. J., Jaggard, K. W., Todd, A. D. & Milford, G. F. J. (1996). An analysis of the agronomic, economic and environmental effects of applying N fertilizer to sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 127, 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon (2000). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops (RB209), 7th edn. London: MAFF.Google Scholar
Anon (2002). Interprofessional Agreement between the National Farmers’ Union and British Sugar plc. Peterborough, UK/Warwickshire, UK: British Sugar/NFU.Google Scholar
Anon (2005). ICUMSA Methods Book. International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis. Berlin: Bartens.Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. J., Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O., Last, P. J. & Day, W. (1986). The dynamics of nitrogen uptake and its remobilization during the growth of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A., Tinker, P. B. H., Draycott, A. P. & Last, P. L. J. (1970). Nitrogen requirements of sugar beet grown on mineral soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. F. & Biscoe, P. V. (1985). Fibrous root-growth and water-use of sugar-beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürcky, K. & Biscoe, P. V. (1983). Stickstoff im rubenblatt und N-translokation aus alternden blättern. In IIRB Symposium: Nitrogen and Sugar Beet. 46th Winter Congress of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research, pp. 63–75. Brussels, Belgium: International Institute for Sugar Beet Research.Google Scholar
Cariolle, M. & Duval, R. (2005). Nutrition-nitrogen. In Sugar Beet (Ed. Draycott, A. P.), pp. 169–184. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Cerrato, M. E. & Blackmer, A. M. (1990). Comparison of models for describing corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 82, 138–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, B. J., Lord, E. I., Nicholson, F. A. & Smith, K. A. (1999). Predicting nitrogen availability and losses following land application of manures: MANNER. Soil Use and Management 15, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. (1969). The effect of farmyard manure on the fertiliser requirement of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Webb, D. J. & Wright, E. M. (1973). The effect of time of sowing and harvesting on growth, yield and nitrogen fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. 1. Yield and nitrogen uptake at harvest. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, B. J. (1984). Design and interpretation of nitrogen response experiments. In The Nitrogen Requirement of Cereals, MAFF/ADAS Reference Book 385, pp. 135–149. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Goodlass, G., Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Dyer, C. J. (2002). Estimation of the nitrogen requirement of winter wheat in the UK: a multiple regression approach. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 82, 720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. 1. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J., Crawford, D. V. & McGowan, M. (1979). Nutrient relations of winter wheat. 2. Movement of nutrients to the root and their uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M. R. J. (1972). Nitrogen response and sowing date: sugar beet. Fisons Agtec, Autumn.Google Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. & Qi, A. (2006). Agronomy. In Sugar Beet (Ed. Draycott, A. P.), pp. 134–168. Oxford: Blackwells.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machet, J. M. & Hébert, J. (1983). Résultats de six années d'essais sur la prévision de la fumure azotée de la betterave sucriere. In IIRB Symposium: Nitrogen and Sugar Beet. 46th Winter Congress of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research, pp. 493–507. Brussels, Belgium: International Institute for Sugar Beet Research.Google Scholar
Malnou, C. S., Jaggard, K. W. & Sparkes, D. L. (2006). A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for the sugar beet crop. European Journal of Agronomy 25, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malnou, C. S., Jaggard, K. W. & Sparkes, D. L. (2007). Nitrogen fertilizer and the efficiency of the sugar beet crop in late summer. European Journal of Agronomy 28, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. (2006). Plant structure and crop physiology. In Sugar Beet (Ed. Draycott, A. P.), pp. 30–49. Oxford: Blackwells.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeteson, J. J. & Smilde, K. W. (1983). Correlative methods of estimating the optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate for sugar beet based on soil mineral nitrogen at the end of the winter period. In IIRB Symposium: Nitrogen and Sugar Beet. 46th Winter Congress of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research, pp. 409–421. Brussels, Belgium: International Institute for Sugar Beet Research.Google Scholar
Nix, J. (2006). Farm Management Pocketbook, 2007. Melton Mowbray, UK: Andersons.Google Scholar
Recke, H. & Nemeth, K. (1985). Relationships between EUF-N fractions, N uptake and quality of sugar-beet in deep loess soils of southern Lower Saxony. Plant and Soil 83, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Jaggard, K. W. (1992). Crop growth and weather: can yield forecasts be reliable? In Proceedings of the 55th Winter Congress of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research, 12–13 February 1992, Brussels, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Van Egmond, F. (1975). The Ionic Balance of the Sugar Beet Plant. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar