Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T04:52:11.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of feed intake of grazing sheep: II. The estimation of faeces output using markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. J. Lambourne
L. J. Lambourne
Affiliation:
Ruakura Animal Research Station, Department of Agriculture, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. One of the biggest difficulties in the measurement of the feed, intake of grazing animals by the indirect method using indigestible ‘markers” is to determine the optimum frequency for dosing and for taking faeces samples in order to achieve greatest accuracy while yet retaining realistic free-grazing conditions of husbandry.

2. Results of earlier studies of the rate of excretion of individual doses of marker by grazing sheep are used to illustrate the probable outcome of various schedules of dosing.

3. It appears that if marker doses were administered and faeces samples were taken twice daily at alternate intervals of 9 and 15 hr. approximately, the mean marker concentration of these samples would yield an essentially unbiased estimate of the general level of marker in the faeces. Since there is no satisfactory evidence that animals fail to excrete all the marker administered, it should be possible then to derive estimates of mean faeces output with an error probably of the order of + 10%.

4. This technique was tested in two stall-feeding trials and and one free-grazing trial with a total of seventeen sheep.

5. The unweighted mean of the estimates of faeces dry-matter output for the seventeen individual sheep periods was about 100 ± 8%.

6. Alternative methods of bulking the faeces samples so as to yield estimates of group mean faeces output are considered, but the possibility of introducing a serious bias by the bulking process is pointed out.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , April 1957 , pp. 415 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, A. N. & Lemaire, H. P. (1947). Canad. J. Res. 25B, 243. Seen only in Chem. Abstr. 41, 6832.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 36, 328.Google Scholar
Coup, M. R. & Lancaster, R. J. (1952). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A 34, 347.Google Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, R. J., Coup, M. R. & Percival, J. C. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A 35, 117.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Kemp, C. D., Kemp, A. W. & Harris, C. E. (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 69.Google Scholar