Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:11:05.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnesium in forage plants I. Magnesium contents of different species and strains as affected by season and soil treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. R. Todd
J. R. Todd
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Stormont, Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Individual herbage species were grown in pots and their magnesium contents studied throughout the growing season. The effects of treatments with sulphate of ammonia, superphosphate and calcined magnesite were also investigated.

2. Of the grasses studied timothy was consistently the lowest in magnesium content, the rye-grasses and cocksfoot being appreciably higher and similar. The clover species had higher magnesium contents than the grasses, especially in the spring.

3. The magnesium contents of the grass species were lowest in spring and showed a marked increase as the season advanced. The corresponding increases in clover magnesium content were considerably smaller.

4. The effects of sulphate of ammonia and superphosphate were slight increases in magnesium contents, but the calcined magnesite resulted in major increases in magnesium contents of both grasses and clovers.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 1961 , pp. 411 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allcroft, W. M. & Green, H. H. (1938). J. Comp. Path. 51, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S., Brown, B. B., Foot, A. S., Rowland, S. J., Allcroft, R. & Parr, W. H. (1954). Brit. Vet. J. 110, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, F. & Stewart, J. (1933). Rep. Direct. Inst. Anim. Path. Camb. 1932–1933.Google Scholar
Eggert, R., Latimer, L. P. & Percival, C. P. (1957). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 70, 10.Google Scholar
Field, A. C., McCallum, J. W. & Butler, E. J. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. (1959). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 14, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkirk, C. S. M., Marshall, D. & Blake, T. A. (1933). Vet. Rec. 13, 355.Google Scholar
Line, C., Head, M. J., Rook, J. A. F., Foot, A. S. & Rowland, S. J. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, A. C. (1951). Annu. Rep. E. Mailing Res. Sta. p. 26.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. A. & Shearer, G. D. (1938). Vet. J. 94, 388.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1929). Minerals in Pasture, etc. Lewis and Co.Google Scholar
Parr, W. H. & Allcroft, R. (1957). Vet. Rec. 69, 1041.Google Scholar
Reith, J. W. S. (1954). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 22, 305.Google Scholar
Russell, F. C. & Duncan, D. L. (1956). Comm. Bur. Anim. Nutr. Tech. Comm. no. 15.Google Scholar
Seekles, L. (1958). O.E.E.C. Project, no. 204.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. J., Conway, A. & Walsh, M. J. (1958). Vet. Rec. 70, 846.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. B. & Holmes, W. (1953). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 4, 401.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. & Reith, J. W. S. (1956). J. Comp. Path. 66, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B., Thompson, H., Oyenuga, V. A. & Armstrong, R. H. (1952). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 20, 10.Google Scholar
Watkin, B. R. (1957). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 12, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, E. (1880). Aschen-Analysen (Quoted by Orr, 1929).Google Scholar