Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:38:50.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigations into the mode of action of farmyard manure. I. The influence of soil moisture conditions on the response of maincrop potatoes to farmyard manure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Holliday ,
P. M. Harris  and
M. R. Baba
R. Holliday
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Leeds University
P. M. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Leeds University
M. R. Baba
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Leeds University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The paper describes ten consecutive field experiments carried out between 1952 and 1961 investigating the action of F.Y.M. on the yield of maincrop potatoes. In all experiments high basal dressings of PK fertilizer were used.

2. Soil moisture deficits were estimated from meteorological data and the maximum deficit (M.S.M.D.) in a particular season used as an index of the dryness of the growing season.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , April 1965 , pp. 161 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, D. A. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A. (1961). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A., Church, B. M. & Hills, M. G. (1961). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 29, 35.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W., Widdowson, F. V. & Wilcox, J. C. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, E. M. & Yates, F. (1941). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 9, 77.Google Scholar
Statistics, Fertiliser (1961). The Fertilisers’ Manufacturers’ Association Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Harris, P. N. (1960). Thesis for degree of M.Sc. Leeds University.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. H. (1938). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 12, 493.Google Scholar
Pearl, R. T. et al. (1954). Tech. Bull. Minisl. of Agric. H.M.S.O. Lond., no. 4.Google Scholar
Stanhill, G. (1958). Private communication.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G., Cooke, E. H. & Cooke, G. W. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Cooke, G. W. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1962). Exp. Husb. No. 8, 30.Google Scholar
Winter, E. J. (1962). Private communication.Google Scholar
Yates, F., Boyd, D. A. & Mathison, I. (1944). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 12, 163.Google Scholar