Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:59:10.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigations in the Triticinae III. The morphology and field behaviour of the A2 generation of interspecific and intergeneric amphidiploids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. D. H. Bell ,
Mary Lupton  and
Ralph Riley
G. D. H. Bell
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
Mary Lupton
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
Ralph Riley
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In general the juvenile growth of interspecific Triticum and intergeneric Tritioum-Aegilops amphidiploids, was normal and did not deviate from the parental behaviour. However, in the case of the interspecific hexaploids derived from T. monococcum and T. aegilopoides there was an early check in growth, and all the amphidiploids derived from A. caudata developed more or less severe chlorosis.

2. Most amphidiploids were intermediate between their parents in mature plant characters. However, in the hexaploid Triticum interspecific amphidiploids there was a transgressive increase in plant height, and whilst the derivatives of Triticum x Aegilops crosses fell within the range of their parents, they were closer to one or other parent depending upon the Aegilops species involved.

3. The ear morphology of the Triticum interspecific amphidiploid was generally a composite of that of the parents, the influence of each parent being detectable. In the Triticum-Aegilops amphidiploids, however, ear morphology was so strongly influenced by the Aegilops species, that there was frequently no obvious difference between the ears of amphidiploids with a common Aegilops parent but different wheat parents.

4. The fertility of the amphidiploids was low and there was no significant correlation between the fertility of amphidiploids and parents. There was a significant correlation between both the grain weight, and number of spikelets per ear, in parents and amphidiploids, but whilst the mean grain weight was about that of the parent with the heavier grain, the mean of spikelets per ear was about that of the parent with the fewer spikelets.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , August 1955 , pp. 199 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, G. D. H. (1950). J. Agri. Sci. 40, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. D. H. & Lupton, F. G. H. (1955). J. Agri. Sci.Google Scholar
Bell, G. D. H. & Sachs, L. (1953). J. Agri. Sci. 43, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, C. D. R. (1941). J. Genet. 42, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellerton, S. (1939). J. Genet. 38, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engledow, F. L. (1923). J. Genet. 13, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kajanus, B. (1927). Bibliogr. genet. 3, 141.Google Scholar
Kihara, H. (1937). Bot. Mag., Tokyo, 51, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihara, H. & Lilienfeld, F. (1932). Cytologia, Tokyo, 3, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilienfeld, F. A. (1951). Cytologia, Tokyo, 16, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKey, J. (1954). Hereditas, Lund., 40, 65.Google Scholar
Mather, K. (1949). Statistical Analysis in Biology, 3rd ed.London.Google Scholar
McFadden, E. S. & Sears, E. R. (1946). J. Hered. 37, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, L. (1952). Heredity, 6, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, L. (1953). Heredity, 7, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1941). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 336, 1.Google Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1944 a). Genetics, 29, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1944 b). Genetics, 29, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1948). Advanc. Genet. 2, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, G. L. Jr. (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, A. E. (1928). J. Genet. 20, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, A. E. (1940). J. Genet. 39, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, A. E. & Ellerton, S. (1940). J. Genet. 40, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar