Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:44:04.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Inheritance of Sterility in the Barleys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. H. Biffen
R. H. Biffen
Affiliation:
Botanist and Lecturer in Agricultural Botany, Agricultural Department, Cambridge University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following note is concerned solely with the behaviour of certain characters in hybrid barleys which bear on the inheritance of sterility and the question whether sex is, as it seems possible, a phenomenon of gametic segregation. I have used the term “sterility” in a broader sense than usual to include cases in which certain florets set no grain owing to the suppression of either the female or both the male and female reproductive organs. The plants themselves are in no cases completely sterile. The other characters occurring in the numerous varieties of barley will be considered in detail later.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , May 1905 , pp. 250 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 250 note 1 Since writing the above Mendel's correspondence with Nägeli has been published by Correns in the Abhandl. d. K.S. Gesellsch. d. Wissensch., math.-phys. Kl. XXIX. III. p. 241 from which it appears that Mendel himself was aware of this possibility.

page 250 note 2 Rimpau, , Landw. Jahrb. Bd. xx. p. 335, 1891.Google Scholar

page 250 note 3 Tschermak, , Zeits. Landw. Versuchs. Oesterreich, 1901, Heft II. p. 1029.Google Scholar

page 251 note 1 Bateson, Presidential Address, Sect. D, British Assoc. Meeting, 1904.

page 251 note 2 Koernicke and Werner, Handbuch des Getreidebaues, p. 147.

page 251 note 3 Beaven, , Journ. Fed. Inst. of Brewing, Vol. VIII. No. 5, p. 542.Google Scholar

page 251 note 4 Ibid.

page 255 note 1 Royle, Botany of the Himalayan Mountains, p. 418 and Pl. 97 (H. aegiceras).

page 255 note 2 Koernicke, Ibid.

page 255 note 3 Beaven, Ibid.

page 255 note 4 Henslow, , Hooker's Journ. of Botany, Vol. I. p. 33, Pls. II. and III. 1849.Google Scholar

page 255 note 5 Baillon, , Bull. de la Soc. bot. de France, Tome 1, p. 187 (1854).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 256 note 1 Compare Rimpau, Ibid. Tschermak, Deutsche Landw. Presse, 14th Oct., 1903.