Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:59:38.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inheritance of Seed Shape and Resistance to Ascochyta Blight in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. B. Rastogi
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops and Floriculture, Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Solan, India
S. S. Saini
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops and Floriculture, Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Solan, India

Summary

To ascertain the inheritance of seed shape and resistance to Ascochyta blight and to incorporate resistance in commercial cultivars, crosses were made between cv. Kinnauri, a round-seeded resistant source and commercially important cvs Bonneville, Lincoln, GC 141, and Selection 18, highly susceptible to disease but wrinkled-seeded. The F1, F2 and F3 data indicated that seed shape and resistance to Ascochyta blight is determined by two independently inherited genes. Round seed and disease resistance are dominant over wrinkled seed and susceptibility. Commercially desirable lines have been selected which combine the resistance gene of Kinnauri with wrinkled seed from susceptible commercial cultivars, and which also possess high pod yields and other desirable characters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali-Khan, S. T., Zimmer, R. C. & Kenashuk, E. (1973). Reaction of pea introductions to Ascochyta foot rot and powdery mildew. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 53, 155156.Google Scholar
Balashov, T. N. & Rybakov, L. M. (1971). Methods of breeding leguminous crops as vegetables in Maldavia. In Metody Issled. s zernobob, kul'urami. 1. pp. 155161.Google Scholar
Kvasnikov, B. V. & Krotov, T. I. (1976). Resistance of varieties of garden pea to Ascochyta disease. (In Russian). Nauchnye trudy nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta ovoshchevodstrennogo khozyaistra 6, 213221.Google Scholar
Lepikhova, R. M. (1973). Immunologieal characteristics of pea varieties in conditions of artificial infection with Ascochyta. Nauchnye trudy nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituia sel'skogo khozyaistra tsentral'nykh raionov nechernozemnoi zony 29, 103105.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. & Dow, P. (1974). Studies in pea on genetics and resistance to Ascochyta pisi (race 3). John Innes Institute, Sixty-fourth Annual Report, Norwich, U.K., 182 pp.Google Scholar
Ondrej, M. (1975). A study of the physiological races of the phytopathogenic fungus Mycosphaerella pinodes Stone in relation to the host [Studium fyziologickych ras fytopatogenni houby Mycosphaerella pinodes Stone ve vztahu k hostiteli.] Thesis, Vysoka skola Zeme–delska Brno, Czechoslovakia 178 pp.Google Scholar
Rastogi, K. B. & Saini, S. S. (1982). Breeding for incorporation of Ascochyta blight resistance in pea cultivars. Ph.D. thesis, Himaehal Pradesh Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Solan.Google Scholar
Rubes, L. (1976). New scientific research findings in the flax, oil crops and legumes breeding section. (In Czech). Vestnik Ceskoslovenske Akademie Zemedelske 23 (8), 366376.Google Scholar
Tomeschevski, Z. & Furgel, K.I. (1975). An investigation into the resistance of field pea in green house, laboratory and field conditions to Ascochyta pinodes, Fusarium and viruses. Biuletyn Instytulu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roslin 128–129, 5358.Google Scholar
Wark, D. C. (1950). The inheritance of resistance to Ascochyta pisi lib. in Pisum sativumL. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 382390.Google Scholar
White, O. (1917). Gene symbols for seed shape in pea. Proceedings of the American Physiological Society 56, 487688.Google Scholar
Yan' Kov, I. I. (1980). Resistance of pea varieties for seed to the main fungal diseases in Tambov Province. Byulleten Vsesoyuznogo ordena Lenina i ordena Druzhby Narodov Instituta Rastenievodstva Imeni 79, 1820.Google Scholar