Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-5wl6q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T05:02:30.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of pod and seed resistance to the cow-pea seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. G. Rusoke  and
T. Fatunla
D. G. Rusoke
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Ife, Ile-lfe, Nigeria
T. Fatunla
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Ife, Ile-lfe, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two seed-resistant land races were crossed to a seed-susceptible cultivar to produce Fl, F2, BC1; and BC2 generations. It was observed that seed resistance was conditioned by two unlinked recessive genes and cytoplasmic factors. Similarly, generations derived from a pod-resistant, seed-susceptible cultivar with a seed-resistant, pod-susceptible land race demonstrated that seed and pod resistance are independently inherited.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 655 - 660
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akingbohungbe, A. E. (1976). A note on the relative susceptibility of unshelled cow-pea to the cow-pea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius, Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin no. 5. pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
Anon. (1981). Annual Report for 1980. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982). Annual Report for 1981. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar
Anon. (1984). Research Highlights for 1983. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar
Coyne, D. P. (1967). Photoperiodism: inheritance and linkage studies in Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Heredity 58, 313–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatunla, T. & Badaru, K. (1983 a). Resistance of cow-pea pods to Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatunla, T. & Badaru, K. (1983 b). Inheritance of resistance to cow-pea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okpalefe, T. E. (1982). The genetics of pod resistance to the cow-pea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr.) in two selected cultivars of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). M.Sc. thesis, Department of Plant Science, University of Ife, Ile-Ife. 41 pp.Google Scholar
Singh, L. & Hadley, H. (1972). Maternal and cytoplasmic effects on seed protein content in soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science 12, 583–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. R. & Allen, E. J. (1979). Cow-pea pests and diseases. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Manual Series no. 2.Google Scholar
Smithson, T. B. & Redden, R. (1979). Insect resistance in cowpea at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. In International Institute of Tropical Agriculture First Annual Research Conference, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P. E. (1973). Relative susceptibility of maize varieties to Sitophilus Zea mais motschulky. Tropical Products Information 25, 16–18.Google Scholar