Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:40:35.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hidden viability risks in the use of farm-saved small-grain seed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

P. PELTONEN-SAINIO ,
A. RAJALA  and
L. JAUHIAINEN
P. PELTONEN-SAINIO*
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
A. RAJALA
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
L. JAUHIAINEN
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Agriculture must provide sustainable food security and economic development to meet future challenges; new cultivars and the use of quality seed will be key components of this. The use of farm-saved seed may increase due to imbalances between income and expenditure associated with farming. The present study characterized the quality of commonly used, and thereby easily available, farm-saved seed in Finland. Farmers provided 657 seed lot samples of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that they intended to use for sowing. Germination, seed weight, seedling elongation and within-seed-lot variability were analysed. Information was available on region, number of seed generations and cultivar. The specific aims were to identify how many generations of farm-saved seed are generally used by farmers, whether there is any safe generation threshold and the variability of quality of the seed lots. It was found that 0·80–0·84 of barley seed lots exceeded the 0·85 minimum germination requirement for certified seed, but only 0·60 of wheat. The risk of poor establishment was higher in wheat if the seed was not tested: 0·13 of wheat seed lots had germination of ⩽0·65 and 0·06 of ⩽0·50, while for barley the proportions with inadequate germination were 0·03–0·05. At most, >0·30 abnormal seedlings were recorded for barley and >0·50 for wheat. Variation in seed size and seedling length within seed lots was important, and increase in the latter was associated with reduced germination. In combination with up to 0·14 lethal fungus-infected seed, this emphasizes the need for seed upgrading measures. No safe threshold for farm-saved seed generations was determined.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 149 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 713 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benjamin, L. R. (1990). Variation in time of seedling emergence within populations: a feature that determines individual growth and development. Advances in Agronomy 44, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, N., Gate, P., Gouache, D., Charmet, G., Oury, F.-X. & Huard, F. (2010). Why are wheat yields stagnated in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France. Field Crops Research 119, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceddia, M. G. & Cerezo, E. R. (2008). A Descriptive Analysis of Conventional, Organic and GM Crop and Certified Seed Production in the EU. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 23443 EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Chastain, T. G., Ward, K. J. & Wysocki, D. J. (1995). Stand establishment responses of soft white winter wheat to seedbed residue and seed size. Crop Science 35, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coolbear, P. (1995). Mechanisms of seed deterioration. In Seed Quality: Basic Mechanisms and Agricultural Implications (Ed. Basra, A. S.), pp. 223–277. Binghamton, NY: Food Products Press.Google Scholar
Finger, R. (2010). Evidence of slowing yield growth – The example of Swiss cereal yields. Food Policy 35, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, Y., Stobbe, E. H. & Moes, J. (1992). Relative date of wheat seedling emergence and its impact on grain yield. Crop Science 32, 1275–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grilli, I., Bacci, E., Lombardi, T., Spano, C. & Floris, C. (1995). Natural ageing: Poly(A) polymerase in germinating embryos of Triticum durum wheat. Annals Botany 76, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurme, T., Jauhiainen, L. & Öfvesten, J. (2009). Estimating location and variability parameters from classified potato tuber size data. In Conference Book NBBC09: 2nd Nordic-Baltic Biometric Conference, 10–12 June 2009, Tartu, Estonia (Ed. Fischer, K.), p. 47. (Abstract). Washington, DC: IBS.Google Scholar
Jittanit, W., Srzednicki, G. & Driscoll, R. (2010). Corn, rice, and wheat seed drying by two-stage concept. Drying Technology 28, 807–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khah, E. M., Roberts, E. H. & Ellis, R. H. (1989). Effects of seed ageing on growth and yield of spring wheat at different plant-population densities. Field Crops Research 20, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, M. & Börner, A. (2010). The longevity of crop seeds stored under ambient conditions. Seed Science Research 20, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, R. E. L. (1993). The effect of parent plant nutrition on seed size, viability and vigour and on germination of wheat and triticale at different temperatures. Annals of Applied Biology 123, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, R. E. L. (2003). Germination of seed lots of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) after extended natural ageing in cool storage. Seed Science and Technology 31, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, R. E. L. & Gurmu, M. (1990). Seed vigour and water relations in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 117, 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, M., Walters, C., Luczak, W., Hill, L. M., Wheeler, L. J. & Puchalski, J. (2009). Assessment of variation in seed longevity within rye, wheat and the intergeneric hybrid triticale. Seed Science Research 19, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonogaki, H., Bassel, G. W. & Bewley, J. D. (2010). Germination – still a mystery. Plant Science 179, 574–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L. & Laurila, I. P. (2009 a). Cereal yield trends in northern European conditions: Changes in yield potential and its realisation. Field Crops Research 110, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L. & Hakala, K. (2009 b). Are there indications of climate change induced increases in variability of major field crops in the northernmost European conditions? Agricultural and Food Science 18, 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L. & Hakala, K. (2011). Crop responses to temperature and precipitation according to long-term multi-location trials at high-latitude conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 149, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kangas, A., Salo, Y. & Jauhiainen, L. (2007). Grain number dominates grain weight in temperate cereal yield determination: evidence basing on 30 years’ multi-location trials. Field Crops Research 100, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Rajala, A., Känkänen, H. & Hakala, K. (2009 c). Improving farming systems in northern European conditions. In Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy (Eds Sadras, V. O. & Calderini, D. F.), pp. 71–97. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajjou, L. & Debeaujon, I. (2008). Seed longevity: Survival and maintenance of high germination ability of dry seeds. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331, 796–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajala, A., Hakala, K., Mäkelä, P. & Peltonen-Sainio, P. (2011). Drought effect on grain number and grain weight at spike and spikelet level in six-row spring barley. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajala, A. & Peltonen-Sainio, P. (2000). Manipulating yield potential in cereals by plant growth regulators. In Growth Regulators in Crop Production (Ed. Basra, A. S.), pp. 27–70. Binghamton, NY: Food Products Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz, M., Martin, I. & De La Cuadra, C. (1999). Cereal seed viability after 10 years of storage in active and base germplasm collections. Field Crops Research 64, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (2004). User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shephard, H. L., Naylor, R. E. L. & Stuchbury, T. (1996). The influence of seed maturity at harvest and drying method on the embryo, alpha-amylase activity and seed vigour in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Seed Science and Technology 24, 245–259.Google Scholar
Stastny, J. & Pazderu, K. (2008). Evaluation of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed quality and seed quality stability in relation to varieties and environmental conditions. Journal of Agrobiology 25, 153–161.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. O. Jr. (1995). The storage of orthodox seeds. In Seed Quality: Basic Mechanisms and Agricultural Implications (Ed. Basra, A. S.), pp. 173–207. Binghamton, NY: Food Products Press.Google Scholar