Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:22:13.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth of axillary buds of Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. bullata sub var. gemmifera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. J. Wilcockson  and
A. E. Abuzeid
S. J. Wilcockson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
A. E. Abuzeid
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In 1984 and 1985, the growth of axillary buds of Brussels sprouts plants was studied at Cockle Park, Northumberland, UK. Bud growth commenced in late September or early October and continued at all nodes until the final harvest in December. Total bud yield increased at a broadly constant rate until late November but at a decreasing rate thereafter. Plants produced c. 100 nodes with buds ≥ 5 mm diameter. The largest buds were c. 40 mm diameter and 25 g fresh weight. Bud size increased from the base of the stem upwards to between the 20th and 40th nodes and then decreased towards the apex. Nodes 20–40 (20% of the total) produced c. 40–45% of total bud yield. The size profile of leaves along the stem followed a similar pattern to the buds and the largest buds were in the axils of the largest leaves. There were close relationships between bud fresh weight and size, bud fresh weight and size, bud fresh weight and volume and log10 bud fresh weight and log10 bud size (r2 ≥ 0·995). The density of buds was c. 0·8 and bud fresh weight doubled for each 5 mm increase in bud diameter.

Current photosynthesis of the leaf canopy was apparently the major source of assimilates for bud growth. A C14 tracing experiment suggested that growth of individual buds was mainly supported by their subtending leaves. There was no evidence of re-translocation of dry matter from dying leaves or the stems to buds or of substantial production of dry matter by the buds themselves. Rates of bud photosynthesis were only about 10% of the rate of leaves. The continued increase in bud fresh weight and size at the lowest nodes when leaves were senescing rapidly and after they had abscissed was probably mainly the result of water uptake rather than dry matter accumulation.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 117 , Issue 2 , October 1991 , pp. 207 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abuzeid, A. E. (1987). Physiological aspects of yield in Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera D.C.). Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Abuzeid, A. E. & Wilcockson, S. J. (1989). Effects of sowing date, plant density and year on growth and yield of Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. bullata sub var. gemmifera). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 112, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1974). The effect of plant density, date of apical bud removal and leaf removal on the growth and yield of single harvest Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera D.C.). II. Variation in bud size. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. M. & Milbourn, G. M. (1974). The effect of plant density, date of apical bud removal and leaf removal on the growth and yield of single harvest Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera D.C.). I. Whole plant and axillary bud growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasbey, C. A., McRae, D. C. & Fleming, J. (1988). The size distribution of potato tubers and its application to grading schemes. Annals of Applied Biology 113, 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. H. (1972). The effects of topping and plant population on dry matter synthesis and distribution in Brussels sprouts. Annals of Applied Biology 70, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackerron, D. K. L., Marshall, B. & Jefferies, R. A. (1988). The distribution of tuber sizes in draughted and irrigated crops of potato. II. Relation between size and weight of tubers and the variability of tuber-size distributions. Potato Research 31, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (1990). Agricultural Statistics United Kingdom 1988. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Morris, G. E. L. & Currah, I. E. (1983). Weight, size and shape relationships and their uses in the study of graded yield data. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, T. H. (1972). The distribution of hormones in relation to apical dominance in Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera L.) plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 23, 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verheij, E. W. M. (1970). Spacing experiments with brussels sprouts for single-pick harvests. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 18, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar