Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T14:02:33.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth, mineral composition and grain yield of irrigated and rainfed millets and sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. K. Muldoon
D. K. Muldoon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, Australia2823
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sorghum bicolor, Pennisetum americanum, Echinochloa utilis, Panicum miliaceum, Setaria italica and Eleusine coracana were grown with and without full irrigation on an alkaline clay soil at Trangie, Australia. Dry-matter yields and forage quality changes with time were measured in the 1st year. Grain yield was recorded over 2 years.

Dry-matter accumulation was initially most rapid in sorghum and Japanese barnyard millet. Sorghum, pearl millet and finger millet produced the most dry matter; these were the latest to reach head emergence. The early-maturing proso millet and foxtail millet produced only 7 and l i t dry matter/ha respectively. These two millets, like sorghum and pearl millet, had a high nitrogen: sulphur ratio and low sodium concentration in the forage. Finger millet had a lower nitrogen: sulphur ratio and a sodium concentration that was surpassed only by Japanese barnyard millet.

Irrigated sorghum consistently produced the highest grain yields: over 9 t/ha. Yields from the millets were: foxtail 6·0, finger 5·0, proso 3·5, pearl and Japanese barnyard millet 2·8–2·9 t/ha. Special features of the millets are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 31 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, F. C. (1976). Sodium and potassium in the nutrition of mammals. Technical Communication, 26, Commonwealth Bureau of Nutrition.Google Scholar
Begg, J. E. & Burton, G. W. (1971). Comparative study of five genotypes of pearl millet under a range of photo periods and temperatures. Crop Science 11, 803–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P. R. (1974). Sulphur metabolism and excretion studies in ruminants. XIII. Intake and utilization of wheat straw by sheep and cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broyles, K. R. & Fribourg, H. A. (1959). Nitrogen fertilization and cutting management of sudangrasses and millets. Agronomy Journal 51, 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, G. W. & Powell, J. B. (1968). Pearl millet breeding and cytogenetics. Advances in Agronomy 20, 49–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coaldrake, P. D., Pearson, C. J., Norman, M. J. T., King, D. H., Nixon, P., Pritchakd, K., Muldoon, D. K. & Ryan, J. (1982). Evaluation of pearl millet as a potential grain crop for eastern Australia. Proceedings of the Second Australian Agronomy Conference, p. 346.Google Scholar
Cottier, K. (1973). Experiments with warm-zone crops for summer green feed in Waikato. Proceedings of Agronomy Society of New Zealand 3, 25–31.Google Scholar
Ferraris, R. (1973). Pearl millet (Pennisetumtypkoides). Review Series No. 1/1973, Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops.Google Scholar
Fussell, L. K. & Pearson, C. J. (1978). Course of grain development and its relationship to black region appearance in Pennisetum americanum. Field Crops Research 1, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greb, B. W. (1978). Millet production with limited water. Progress Report No. 15, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar
Hall, B. D. (1975). Millet varieties for the Darling Downs. Field Crops Newsletter 10, 37–38.Google Scholar
Hedges, D. A., Wheeler, J. L.Mulcahy, C. & Vincent, M. S. (1978). Composition and acceptability to sheep of twelve summer forage crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18, 520–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinze, G. (1977). Millets in Colorado. Bulletin 5535, Colorado State University Experiment Station, Fort Collins.Google Scholar
Muldoon, D. K. (1985 a). Summer forages under irrigation. I. Growth and development. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 25 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Muldoon, D. K. (1985 b). Summer forages under irrigation. II. Forage composition. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 25 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Muldoon, D. K. (1985 c). The effect of photoperiod on the growth and development of Echinochloa spp. millets. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 25 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Nanda, K. K., Grover, R. & Chinoy, J. J. (1957 a). Some observations on lateral bud development in Panicum miliaceum and Setaria italica. Phyton 8, 97–108.Google Scholar
Nanda, K. K., Grover, R. & Chinoy, J. J. (1957 b). Factors affecting growth and development of some millets. I. Stem elongation and its correlations with flowering as influenced by the time of sowing. Phyton 9, 15–25.Google Scholar
Northcote, K. H. (1979). A Factual Key for the Recognition of Australian Soils. Adelaide: Rellim.Google Scholar
Purseglove, J. W. (1977). Tropical Crops: Monocotyledons. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Rocks, R. L., Lutton, J. J. & McCabe, T. P. (1973). Estimation of total sulphur and sulphur-35 in soil and biological materials using automatic equipment. Conference on Science Technology {Abstracts), ANZAAS, S. A. Incorporated, Adelaide, p. 13.Google Scholar
Stobbs, T. H. (1975). A comparison of zulu sorghum, bulrush millet and white panicum in terms of yield, forage quality and milk production. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. L. (1980). Increasing animal production from sorghum forage. World Animal Review 35, 13–22.Google Scholar