Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:13:09.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and yield responses of rice to carbon dioxide concentration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. T. Baker ,
L. H. Allen Jr  and
K. J. Boote
J. T. Baker
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department
L. H. Allen Jr
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
K. J. Boote
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Rice plants (Oryza saliva L., cv. IR30) were grown in paddy culture in outdoor, naturally sunlit, controlled-environment, plant growth chambers at Gainesville, Florida, USA, in 1987. The rice plants were exposed throughout the season to subambient (160 and 250), ambient (330) or superambient (500, 660, 900 μmol CO2/mol air) CO2 concentrations. Total shoot biomass, root biomass, tillering, and final grain yield increased with increasing CO2 concentration, thegreatest increase occurring between the 160 and 500 μmol CO2/mol air treatments. Early in the growing season, root:shoot biomass ratio increased with increasing CO2 concentration; although the ratio decreased during the growing season, net assimilation rate increased with increasingCO2 concentration and decreased during the growing season. Differences in biomass and lamina area among CO2 treatments were largely due to corresponding differences in tillering response. The number of panicles/plant was almost entirely responsible for differences in final grain yield among CO2 treatments. Doubling the CO2 concentration from 330 to 660 μmol CO2/mol air resulted in a 32 % increase in grain yield. These results suggest that important changes in the growth and yield of rice may be expected in the future as the CO2 concentration of the earth's atmosphere continues to rise.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 313 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, J. T., Allen, L. H. Jr, Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W. & Jones, P. H. (1990). Developmental responses of rice to photoperiod and carbon dioxide concentration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 50, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D., Neftel, A. & Oeschger, H. (1983). Comparison of CO2 measurements by two laboratories on air bubbles in polar ice. Nature 302, 410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D., Korotkevich, Y. S. & Lorius, C. (1987). Vostok ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO2. Nature 329, 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, W., Oeschger, H. & Stauffer, B. (1980). Information on the CO2 cycle from ice-core studies. Radiocarbon 22, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cure, J. D. (1985). Carbon dioxide doubling responses: a crop survey. In Direct Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation (Eds Strain, B. R. & Cure, J. D.), pp. 99–116. Report DOE/ER-0238. Washington DC: Carbon Dioxide Research Division, United States Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Delmas, R. J., Ascencia, J. M. & Legrand, M. (1980). Polar ice evidence that atmospheric CO2 20,000 B.P. was 50% of present. Nature 284, 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, J. A., Reilly, J., Trabalka, J. R. & Reichle, D. E. (1984). An analysis of possible future atmospheric retention of fossil fuel CO2 Report DOE/ER–21400–1. Washington DC: Carbon Dioxide Research Division, United States Department of Energy. (Available from NTIS, Springfield, VA, USA.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammon, R. H. & Fraser, P. J. (1985). History of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. In Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and the Global Carbon Cycle (Ed. Trabalka, J. R.), pp. 25–62. Washington DC: Carbon Dioxide Research Division, United States Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Gifford, R. M. (1977). Growth pattern, carbon dioxide exchange, and dry weight distribution in wheat growing under differing photosynthetic environments. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 4, 99–110.Google Scholar
Gifford, R. M. (1979). Growth and yield of CO2-enriched wheat under water-limited conditions. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 6, 367–378.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, J. & De Ruiter, H. E. (1983). Plant growth in response to CO2 enrichment, at two levels of nitrogen and phosphorus supply. I. Dry matter, leaf area and development. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 31, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K., Coleman, D. F. & Yanagisawa, T. (1985). Increase of atmospheric partial pressure of carbon dioxide and growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Japanese Journal of Crop Science 54, 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K. & Murata, Y. (1976). Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on growth and dry matter production in crop plants. I. Effects on leaf area, dry matter, tillering, dry matter distribution ratio, and transpiration. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 45, 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K. & Murata, Y. (1979a). Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on growth and dry matter production in crop plants. 6. Effect of oxygen concentration on the carbon dioxide-dry matter production relationship in some C3 and C4 crop species. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 48, 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K. & Murata, Y. (1979b). Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on growth and dry matter production in crop plants. 7. Influence of light intensity and temperature on the effect of carbon dioxide enrichment in some C3 and C4 species. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 48, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P., Jones, J. W., Allen, L. H. Jr, & Mishoe, J. W. (1984). Dynamic computer control of closed environment plant growth chambers. Design and verification. Transactionsof the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 27, 879–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, C. D. (1983). The global carbon cycle: what we know and could know from atmospheric, biospheric, and oceanic observations. In Carbon Dioxide, Science, and Consensus. (CCWF–820970) (Ed. Clark, W. C.), pp. 377–385. Washington DC: Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge Associated Universities. (Available from NTIS, Springfield, VA, USA )Google Scholar
Keeling, C. D., Bacastow, R. B. & Whorf, T. P. (1982). Measurements of the concentration of carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. In CO2 Review (Ed. Clark, W. C.), pp. 377–385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kimball, B. A. (1983). Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage of 430 prior observations. Agronomy Journal 75, 779–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J. P. & Jarvis, P. G. (1971). Methods of growth analysis. In Plant Photosynthetic Production: Manual of Methods (Eds Sestak, Z., Catsky, J. & Jarvis, P. G.), pp. 343–391. The Hague: Dr W. Junk, N.V. Publishers.Google Scholar
Mauney, J. R., Fry, K. E. & Guinn, G. (1978). Relationship of photosynthetic rate to growthand fruiting of cotton, soybean, sorghum and sunflower. Crop Science 18, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morison, J. I. L. & Gifford, R. M. (1984). Plant growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentrations. I. Leaf area, water use and transpiration. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11, 361–374.Google Scholar
Murata, Y. & Matsushima, S. (1978). Rice. In Crop Physiology: Some Case Histories (Ed. Evans, L. T.), pp. 73–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neftel, A., Oeschger, H., Schwander, J., Stauffer, B. & Zumbrunn, R. (1982). Ice coremeasurements give atmospheric CO2 content during the past 40,000 y. Nature 295, 220–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neftel, A., Moore, E., Oeschger, H. & Stauffer, B. (1985). Evidence from polar ice cores for the increase in atmospheric CO2 in the last two centuries. Nature 315, 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, P. C. (1969). The growth of four rice varieties as affected by temperature and photoperiod with uniform daily periods of light. Experimental Agriculture 5, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, D. T. & Flint, E. P. (1980). Potential effects of global atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and competitiveness of C3 and C4 weed and crop plants. Weed Science 28, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, D. T., Myer, C. R., Flint, E. P. & Quimby, P. C. Jr, (1979). Temperature response and potential distribution of itchgrass (Rottboellia exallala L.f.) in the United States. Weed Science 27, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynaud, D. & Barnola, J. M. (1985). An Antarctic ice core reveals atmospheric CO2 variations over the past few centuries. Nature 315, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sionit, N., Hellmers, H. & Strain, B. R. (1980). Growth and yield of wheat under CO2 enrichment and water stress. Crop Science 20, 687–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sionit, N., Strain, B. R. & Hellmers, H. (1981 a). Effects of different concentrationsof atmospheric CO2 on growth and yield components of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sionit, N., Mortensen, D. A., Strain, B. R. & Hellmers, H. (1981 b). Growth response of wheat to CO2 enrichment and different levels of mineral nutrition. Agronomy Journal 73, 1023–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaminathan, M. S. (1984). Rice. Scientific American 250, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabalka, J. R., Edmonds, J. A., Reilly, J. M., Gardner, R. H. & Reichle, D. E. (1986). Atmospheric CO2 projections with globally averaged carbon cycle models. In The Changing Carbon Cycle, a Global Analysis (Eds Trabalka, J. R. & Reichle, D. E.), pp. 534–560. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodwell, G. M., Whittaker, R. H., Reiners, W. A., Likens, G. E., Delwiche, C. C. & Botkin, D. B. (1978). The biota and the world carbon budget. Science 199, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshida, S. (1981). Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. Los BaÑnos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S., Cock, J. H. & Parao, F. T. (1972). Physiological aspects of high yields. In Rice Breeding, pp. 455–469. Los BaÑnos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar