Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:00:17.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growing spring cereals in a white clover (Trifolium repens) crop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. D. Williams  and
M. J. Hayes
E. D. Williams
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, UK
M. J. Hayes
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Spring barley and spring oats were strip-seeded into crops of the white clover cultivar Alice at Hereford in 1987 and cultivar S184 at Aberystwyth in 1988. Drilling was done with or without a band-spray of glyphosate, a moderate or low (1988 only) dose of paraquat or into plots where the clover had been killed by herbicide 2 months previously.

In the first experiment, initial cereal emergence was sparse; growth was suppressed in the unchecked (unsprayed) clover base but was vigorous in the clover-free plots; the cereals also became dominant in the swards sprayed with herbicide. Whole-crop yields in mid-August were 13, 3–4 and 8–10 t DM/ha in the plots in which clover was killed, unchecked or checked with herbicide. Clover contributed 4–12% of the harvested herbage in the latter treatment. This treatment also yielded c. 70 % as much N, carbohydrate and fibre as that without clover. Grain yields exceeded 7 t/ha without clover but were only 0·3 t/ha for barley and 1·1 t/ha for oats with unchecked clover; in the checked clover plots, barley yielded 60% and oats 78% as much as on the clover-free plots. Four and 5 weeks after whole-crop harvest, residual clover growth was 27 and 39% of that on unchecked plots for oats and barley, respectively.

In the second experiment, the cereals emerged thickly but were later dominated by the clover, and an equitable balance was achieved only with the larger dose of paraquat. However, the oat cultivar Emrys was suppressed less than the tall barley cultivar Dandy; the short barley cultivar Digger was the most suppressed. Mean whole-crop yields were 11 t/ha in the treatment without clover, about half this in the unchecked bases and c. 9 t/ha with the larger dose of paraquat. Differences in chemical composition reflected much larger clover contents in 1988 than in 1987. Yields of N and water-soluble carbohydrate were at least as large or larger with moderate paraquat than for the clover-free plots. Grain yields ranged from 5·6 to 6·9 t/ha for the three cereal cultivars without clover but were negligible to very small in the unchecked and band-sprayed treatments, and were 3·4 and 2·0 t/ha for oats and barley, respectively, with the larger dose of paraquat. Residual stolon weights, 70–80 days after whole-crop harvest, greatly exceeded initial values in all treatments. They were smallest following the larger dose of paraquat, and larger in Digger than in Dandy, which in turn was larger than in Emrys.

It is concluded that the concept of growing cereals in a clover base shows potential as a low input–moderate output system of cereal production. However, further longer term work is needed on regulation of the cereal–clover balance, on the release and uptake of N and the environmental effects of the technique.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. 23 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron, V. S. & Kibite, S. (1987). Relationships of maturity, height and morphological traits with whole-plant yield and digestibility of barley cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 67, 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brophy, L. S., Heichel, G. H. & Russelle, M. P. (1987). Nitrogen transfer from forage legumes to grass in a systematic planting design. Crop Science 27, 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, A. L., Taylor, R. L. & Burton, V. L. (1979). Relative yields and nutritive values of barley, oats and peas harvested at four successive dates for forage. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 740–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruulsema, T. W. & Christie, B. R. (1987). Nitrogen contribution to succeeding corn from alfalfa and red clover. Agronomy Journal 79, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. C. P. & Robertson, A. G. (1974). The effects of shading and defoliation on nodulation and nitrogen fixation by white clover. Plant and Soil 41, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabney, S. M., Breitenbeck, G. A., Griffin, J. L. & Hoff, B. J. (1989). Subterranean clover cover crop used to increase rice yield. Agronomy Journal 81, 483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances in Agronomy 15, 1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droushiotis, D. N. (1989). Mixtures of annual legumes and small-grained cereals for forage production under low rainfall. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113, 249–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebelhar, S. A., Frye, W. W. & Blevins, R. L. (1984). Nitrogen from legume cover crops for no-tillage corn. Agronomy Journal 76, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, C. A. (1989). Biological efficiencies in multiplecropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 42, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groya, F. L. & Sheaffer, C. C. (1985). Nitrogen from forage legumes: harvest and tillage effects. Agronomy Journal 77, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, W. L. (1986). Winter legumes as a nitrogen source for no-till grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal 78, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, R. J. (1980). Competitive aspects of the grasslegume association. Advances in Agronomy 33, 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heichel, G. H. (1978). Stabilizing agricultural energy needs: Role of forages, rotations and nitrogen fixation. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 33, 279–282.Google Scholar
Hodgson, H. J. (1956). Effect of seeding rates and time of harvest on yield and quality of oat-pea forage. Agronomy Journal 48, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, P. B. & Leitch, R. H. (1983). Effects of forage legume species on soil moisture, nitrogen and yield of succeeding crops. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 63, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. (1990). White clover understorey as a supply of nitrogen to cereals. In Proceedings of the 13th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Volume 1 (Eds Gáborčik, N., Krajčovič, V. & Zimkova, M.), pp.154–158. Banksá Bystrica, Czechoslovakia: Grassland Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kurtz, T., Melsted, S. W. & Bray, R. H. (1952). The importance of nitrogen and water in reducing competition between intercrops and corn. Agronomy Journal 44, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, J. N., Amato, M., Jackson, R. B. & Butler, J. H. A. (1983). Utilization by wheat crops of nitrogen from legume residues decomposing in soils in the field. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 15, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes, D. A. & Jones, D. I. H. (1971). Yield, nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of whole-crop spring cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, G. J., Rees, M. C. & Charles-Edwards, D. A. (1986). Relations between summer crops and ground cover legumes in a sub-tropical environment. I. Effect of a Vigna trilobata ground cover on growth and yield of sorghum and sunflower. Field Crops Research 15, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunnan, T. (1989). Barley-pea mixtures for whole crop forage: Effects of different cultural practices on yield and quality. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3, 57–71.Google Scholar
Martin, M. P. L. D. & Snaydon, R. W. (1982 a). Intercropping barley and beans. I. Effects of planting pattern. Experimental Agriculture 18, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. P. L. D. & Snaydon, R. W. (1982 b). Root and shoot interactions between barley and field beans when intercropped. Journal of Applied Ecology 19, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C. & Tetlow, R. M. (1987). Whole-crop wheat as conserved feed for beef production. In Straw-A Valuable Raw Material. Paper and Board Printing and Packaging Industries Research Association (Pira) International Conference, Cambridge10 1987, 3, 1–12. Leatherhead, Surrey: Pira.Google Scholar
Moreira, N. (1989). The effect of seed rate and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and nutritive value of oat-vetch mixtures. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 112, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, I. A. (1957). The effect of stage of maturity on yield and chemical composition of oats for haymaking. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 49, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, H. (1935). Mixed cropping in primitive agriculture. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3, 189–195.Google Scholar
Ofori, F. & Stern, W. R. (1987). Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41, 41–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Shand, W. J. (1987). The effect of type and variety of cereals on nutritive value of straw. In Straw - A Valuable Raw Material. Paper and Board, Printing and Packaging Industries Research Association (Pira) International Conference, Cambridge10 1987, 1, 17–30. Leatherhead, Surrey: Pira.Google Scholar
Osman, A. E. & Osman, A. M. (1982). Performance of mixtures and legume forages in Sudan. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, I. (1987). Effect of preceding legume or cereal on barley grain and nitrogen yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, I. & Samios, T. H. (1987). Comparison of rotations in which barley for grain follows woollypod vetch or forage barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papendick, R. I., Sanchez, P. A. & Triplett, G. B. (Eds) (1976). Multiple Cropping. Special Publication no. 27. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascal, J. A. & Sheppard, B. W. (1985). The development of a strip-seeder for sward improvement. Research and Development in Agriculture 2, 125–134.Google Scholar
Patra, D. D., Sachdev, M. S. & Subbiah, B. V. (1986). Nitrogen uptake and efficiency in wheat-gram and maizecowpea intercropping systems. Fertilizer News 31, 21–27.Google Scholar
Patriquin, D. G. (1986). Biological husbandry and the ‘nitrogen problem”. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 3 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos Monreal, A. & Quintana Gomes-Bravo, J. (1986). The role of legumes in energy saving. Proceedings of the 11th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation (Eds Borba, F. M. & Abreu, J. M.), pp. 96–107. Elvas, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Pastagens e Forragens.Google Scholar
Remison, S. U. (1978). Neighbour effects between maize and cowpea at various levels of N and P. Experimental Agriculture 14, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, I. & Ngah, A. W. (1983). Yielding ability and competitive ability of forage legumes under contrasting defoliation regimes. In Temperate Legumes (Eds Jones, D. G. & Davies, D. R.), pp. 77–88. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
Rhodes, I. & Webb, K. J. (1989). White clover varieties for the future. In The Attractions of Forage Legumes. Joint meeting of the South West and Wessex Forage Legume Groups of the British Grassland Society at the AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, England, pp. 2.1–2.20. Hurley, Maidenhead: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Rogers, H. H. (1967). Breeding for maximum production. Occasional Symposium on Fodder Conservation, British Grassland Society 3, 66–73.Google Scholar
Rolston, M. P., Chu, A. C. P. & Fillery, I. R. P. (1976). Effect of paraquat on the nitrogen-fixing activity of white clover. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 47–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. R. (1965). The transference of nitrogen from pasture legumes to an associated grass under several systems of management in pot culture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 915–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, W. D. P. & Rosswall, T. (Eds) (1982). The nitrogen cycle. Philosophical Transactions of the Roval Society of London B 296, 299–576.Google Scholar
Stuthman, D. D. & Marten, G. C. (1972). Genetic variation and quality of oat forage. Crop Science 12, 831–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallis, I. (1978). Nitrogen relationships in grass/legume mixtures. In Plant Relations in Pastures (Ed. Wilson, J. R.), pp. 190–201. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Vandermeer, J. (1989). The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagger, M. G. (1989 a). Time of desiccation effects on plant composition and subsequent nitrogen release from several winter annual cover crops. Agronomy Journal 81, 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagger, M.G. (1989 b). Cover crop management and nitrogen rate in relation to growth and yield of no-till corn. Agronomy Journal 81 533–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, R. W., Saha, N. K. & Rowlands, E. T. (1984). Nitrogen partitioning in cereals. Annual Report of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1983, 112.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979 a). Intercropping – its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32 (1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979b). Intercropping – its importance and research needs. Part 2. Agronomy and research approaches. Field Crop Abstracts 32 (2), 73–85.Google Scholar