Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:26:28.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fodder legumes affecting sequential crop production and fertilizer N use efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. De ,
M. A. Salim Khan ,
M. S. Katti  and
V. Raja
R. De
Affiliation:
Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
M. A. Salim Khan
Affiliation:
Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030, India
M. S. Katti
Affiliation:
Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030, India
V. Raja
Affiliation:
Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments made with winter fodder crops, lucerne (Medicago sativa), berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum) and oats (Avena sativa) and summer fodder crops, cow pea (Vigna unguiculata), guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba), sunhemp (Crotolaria juncea) and pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) showed that a sequential crop of Sudan grass yielded more after the legumes than after the cereal fodders, oats or pearl millet. The legume advantage was noted in the crop not given fertilizers but also when Sudan grass was given N fertilizer. The yield increase in Sudan grass grown after legumes was equivalent to 32–60 kg fertilizer N/ha applied to Sudan grass following pearl millet.

After harvesting the legumes more available N and NO3-N was present in the soil and the apparent recovery of fertilizer N by a subsequent crop was increased by the legume.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

De, R., Rao, Y. Y. & Ali, W. (1983). Grain and fodder legumes as preceding crops affecting the yield and N economy of rice. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhillon, N. S. & Dev, G. (1979). Changes in available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in soil of different fertility status as affected by groundnut–wheat rotation. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 27, 138–141.Google Scholar
Dobereiner, J. & Campelo, A. B. (1977). Importance of legumes and their contribution to tropical agriculture. In A Treatise on Dinitrogen Fixation (ed. Hardy, R. W. F. and Gibson, A. H.), pp. 191–220. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dyke, G. V. & Slope, D. B. (1978). Effects of previous legume crops on grain yield and take-all in spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giri, G. & De, R. (1979). Effect of preceding grain legumes on dryland pearl millet in NW India. Experimental Agriculture 15, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giri, G. & De, R. (1981). Short-season fodder legume effects on the grain yield and nitrogen economy of barley under dryland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 457–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lal, R. B., De, R. & Singh, R. K. (1978). Legume contribution to the fertilizer economy in legume–cereal rotations. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 48, 419–424.Google Scholar
Sen, S., Bains, S. S. & Mathur, B. P. (1962). Phosphate manuring of legumes. IX. Direct and indirect manuring of cereals in rotation with rabi legumes. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 10, 283–288.Google Scholar
Wild, A. (1972). Mineralization of soil nitrogen at a savanna site in Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 8, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar