Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:22:44.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertilizer requirements of sugar beet on fen peat soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P.B. Tinker
P.B. Tinker
Affiliation:
Brooms Barn Experimental StationHigham, Bury St Edmunds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eighteen trials were carried out to test factorial combinations of N, P, K and Na fertilizers on sugar beet over 3 years on deep light peat soils in the area surrounding the Wash. The average yield responses to all fertilizers were very small, and only rarely profitable, except to sodium. Nitrogen increased yield on a few sites, but there was no obvious way of distinguishing these, and on average there was no justification for using this fertilizer, which depressed sugar percentage. The difference from earlier work, which showed good responses to P and K, is ascribed to repeated heavy dressing of fertilizer given to these soils during the last two decades.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 73 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, S. N. (1961). The effect of time of application of phosphate and potash onsugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56, 127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, C. & Caldwell, T.H. (1967). Personal communication. (Report to Regional Experiments Committee, National Agricultural Advisory Service, Eastern Region, REC 1281.)Google Scholar
Biggar, T. C., Davis, J. F. & Lawton, K. (1953). The behaviour of applied phosphorus and potassium in organic soil as indicated by soil tests and the relationship between soil tests, green-tissue tests and crop yields. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 17, 279–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A., Garner, H. V. & Haines, W.B. (1957). The fertilizer requirements of sugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 48, 464–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blood, J. W. et al. (1962). Survey of fertilizer practice. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. F. (1956). Organic Soils. Adv. Agron. 8, 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. R. & Folland, J. C. (1967). Soils of the South-West Lancashire coastal plain, sheets 74 and 83. Mem. Soil Surv., Harpenden.Google Scholar
Hodge, C.A.H. & Seale, R. S. (1966). The soils of the district around Cambridge, sheet 188 Mem. Soil. Surv., Harpenden.Google Scholar
Pizer, N. H., Wright, H. A., Caldwell, T. H., Habgrave, J., Burgess, G. R., Cory, V. & Boyd, D. A. (1961). A study of the peat fenlands with particular reference to potato manuring. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinker, P.B. (1965). The effects of nitrogen, potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Cooke, G. W. (1962). Comparisons between methods of measuring soluble phosphorus and potassium in soils used for fertilizer experiments on sugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59, 269–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar