Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:36:14.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fat deposition in Hereford and Friesian steers: 1. Body composition and partitioning of fat between depots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. G. Truscott ,
J. D. Wood  and
H. J. H. MacFie
T. G. Truscott
Affiliation:
Animal Physiology Division, A.R.C. Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY
J. D. Wood
Affiliation:
Animal Physiology Division, A.R.C. Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY
H. J. H. MacFie
Affiliation:
Animal Physiology Division, A.R.C. Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper, the first of a series of three in which fat deposition is examined in 42 castrate male Hereford and Friesian cattle, details are given on the experimental material and procedures used in all papers. Whole body composition (anatomical and chemical) and the partitioning of fat within the body are also reported in this paper.

Four, two and 15 animals were slaughtered at 6, 13 and 20 months of age, respectively, after ad libitum feeding of a complete pelleted diet.

The Friesians were heavier than the Herefords, having 10%, 20% and 14% heavier empty bodies at 6, 13 and 20 months, respectively.

At the same age, the Friesians had a greater percentage of empty-body weight as carcass muscle, carcass bone, total body water and total body ash than the Herefords but a lower percentage as dissectible fat and total body lipid. An analysis of linear body measurements showed no difference between breeds in the stage of development of external body dimensions at 20 months of age, and it was concluded that at the same age and stage of development of live weight or size, the Friesians were leaner than the Herefords.

Relative growth coefficients of the fat depots showed late developmental growth in some intra-abdominal depots (omental and perirenal–retroperitoneal) but not in another (mesenteric). Relative growth coefficients of the omental, mesenterie and intermuscular depots were different between breeds. The Herefords deposited more dissectible fat subcutaneously than the Friesians whereas the Friesians deposited more in the intraabdominal depots. A multivariate index of fat partitioning, which was not influenced by age or stage of development of the fat depots, was not significantly correlated with fatness, suggesting no direct link between the pattern of fat partitioning and body-fat content.

Breed differences in the distribution of fat within the subcutaneous and intermuscular depots were minor compared with the large difference in the partitioning of fat between depots. It was thus concluded that the factors controlling fat partitioning do not influence the distribution of fat within depots.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 257 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1977). An evaluation of Limousin and Simmental bulls in Britain. Final report of the Limousin and Simmental Tests Steering Committee. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Bakke, H. (1975). Serum levels of non-esterified fatty acids and glucose in lines of pigs selected for rate of gain and thickness of back fat. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 25, 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. & Liboriussen, T. (1978). Growth of bovine tissues. 3. Genetic influences on patterns of growth and distribution of young bulls. Animal Production 27, 63–70.Google Scholar
Blackith, R. E. & Reyment, R. A. (1971). Mullivariale Morphometrics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blakely, D. K., Wilton, J. W., Usborne, W. R. & Burnside, E. B. (1979). The effect of breed of sire group on beef production and carcass characteristics. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58, 639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, P. J., McIntosh, J. A. R. & Spencer, A. (1970). The evaluation of a device for feeding grouphoused animals individually. Animal Production 12, 245–252.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. & Williams, D. R. (1981). Beef carcass evaluation – measurement of composition using anatomical dissection. Agricultural Research Council, Meat Research Institute, Memorandum 47 (mimeo.).Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. & Wood, J. D. (1982). Partitioning of body fat in British Friesian and Jersey steers. Animal Production (in the Press).Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1961). Comparative studies of meat. VII. A comparison between Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 56 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. D. & Johnson, E. R. (1976). Breed differences in amount and distribution of bovine carcass dissectible fat. Journal of Animal Science 42, 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chestnutt, D. M. B., Marsh, R., Wilson, J. G., Stewart, T. A., McCullough, T. A. & McCallion, T. (1975). Effects of breed of cattle on energy requirements for growth. Animal Production 21, 109–119.Google Scholar
Dean, R. A., Holloway, J. W., Whiteman, J. W., Stephens, D. F. & Totusek, R. (1976). Feedlot performance of progeny of Hereford, Hereford × Holstein and Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 42, 290–296.Google Scholar
Dole, V. P. & Meinertz, H. (1960). Microdetermination of long-chain fatty acids in plasma and tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 235, 2596–2599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncombe, W. G. (1963). The colorimetric microdetermination of long-chain fatty acids. Biochemical Journal 88, 7–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane, Stanley G. H. (1957). A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrett, W. N. (1971). Energetic efficiency of beef and dairy steers. Journal of Animal Science 32, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N. G., Wood, J. D., Enser, M., Smith, W. C. & Ellis, M. (1981). Fat mobilization in Large White pigs selected for low back fat thickness. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, I. C., Bines, J. A., Morant, S. V. & Ridley, J. L. (1978). Endocrine control of energy metabolism in the cow: comparison of the levels of hormones (prolactin, growth hormone, insulin and thyroxine) and metabolites in the plasma of high- and low- yielding cattle at various stages of lactation. Journal of Endocrinology 77, 333–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, I. C., Flux, D. S., Andrews, P. & McNielly, A. S. (1975). Radioimmunoassay for ovine and caprine growth hormone: its application to the measurement of basal circulating levels of growth hormone in the goat. Hormone and Metabolic Research 7, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, H. E. (1969). Comparative feedlot performance of dairy and beef type steers. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, 1969, pp. 51–58. New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Henningsson, T. & Brännäng, E. (1974). Crossbreeding for beef with Swedish Friesian cattle. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 4, 25–32.Google Scholar
Ho, R. J. (1970). Radiochemical assay of long-chain fatty acids using 63Ni as tracer. Analytical Biochemistry 36, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, R. L. & Allen, C. E. (1973). Cellularity of bovine adipose tissue. Journal of Lipid Research 14, 605–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. D. M., Price, M. A. & Berg, R. T. (1980). Fattening patterns in cattle. 2. Fat distribution among the wholesale cuts. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 851–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J. (1981). Fat partition and distribution in the carcass of cattle, sheep and pigs. Meat Science 5, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. D. & Smith, R. J. (1976). Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 2. Distribution between joints. Animal Production 23, 223–232.Google Scholar
Kirtland, J. & Gurr, M. I. (1979). Adipose tissue cellularity: a review. 2. The relationship between cellularity and obesity. International Journal of Obesity 3, 15–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Lister, D. (1976). Effects of nutrition and genetics on the composition of the body. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 351–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lister, D. (1980). Hormones, metabolism and growth. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 20, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. & Taylor, St C. S. (1976). Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23, 281–293.Google Scholar
McCullough, H. (1968). Semi-automated method for differential determination of plasma catecholamines. Journal of Clinical Pathology 21, 759–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marriott, F. H. C. (1974). The Interpretation of Multiple Observations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B. (1976). Beef production as influenced by grazing and feeding management and by mature size. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M., Tulloh, N. M. & Winter, W. H. (1977). The effect of three different growth rates on some offal components of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. (1955). Conformation and body composition. In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, vol. 2 (ed. Hammond, J.), pp. 430–542. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T., Bensadoun, A., Bull, L. S., Burton, J. H., Gleeson, P. A., Han, I. K., Joo, Y. D., Johnson, D. E., McManus, W. R., Paladines, O. L., Stroud, J. W., Tyrrell, H. F., Van Niekerk, B. D. H., Wellington, G. W. & Wood, J. D., (1968 a). Changes in body composition and meat characteristics accompanying growth of animals. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, 1968, pp. 18–37. New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T., Bensadoun, A., Bull, L. S., Burton, J. H., Gleeson, P. A., Han, I. K., Joo, Y. D., Johnson, D. E., McManus, W. R., Paladines, O. L., Stroud, J. W., Tyrrell, H. F., Van Niekerk, B. D. H. & Wellington, G. W. (1968 b). Some peculiarities in the body composition of animals. In Body Composition in Animals and Man (ed. Reid, J. T.), pp. 19–44. National Academy of Science, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Robelin, J. (1981). Cellularity of bovine adipose tissues: developmental changes from 15 to 65 per cent mature weight. Journal of Lipid Research 22, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. J., Reid, I. M., Pike, B. V. & Turfrey, B. R. (1979). Tissue mobilization in dairy cows in early lactation. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38, 68A (Abstract).Google ScholarPubMed
Ross, G. J. S. (1975). Simple non-linear modelling for the general user. Proceedings of the 40th Session of the International Statistics Institute of Warsaw 2, 585–593.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Gunn, R. G. & Doney, J. M. (1968). Components of weight loss in pregnant hill ewes during winter. Animal Production 10, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. S. (1975). The growth of Ayrshire cattle: an analysis of linear body measurements. Animal Production, 21 217–226.Google Scholar
Sjöstrom, L., Björntorp, P. & Vrana, J. (1971). Microscopic fat cell size measurements on frozen-cut adipose tissue in comparison with automatic determinations of osmium-fixed fat cells. Journal of Lipid Research 12, 521–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Standal, N., Vold, E., Trygstad, O. & Foss, I. (1973). Lipid mobilization in pigs selected for leanness or fatness. Animal Production 16, 37–42.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. (1980). Genetic size-scaling rules in animal growth. Animal Production 30, 161–166.Google Scholar
Truscott, T. G. (1980). A study of relationships between fat partition and metabolism in Hereford and Friesian steers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Truscott, T. G., Lang, C. P. & Tulloh, N. M. (1976). A comparison of body composition and tissue distribution of Friesian and Angus steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. & Maritz, J. S. (1964). Comparative breed studies of beef cattle. II. Changes in size and shape. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 316–332.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Smith, J. S. & Dewey, P. J. S. (1975). The nutritive value for sheep of ruminant diet AA6, a complete cobbed diet containing 30% barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. R. (1978). Partition and distribution of fatty tissues. In Patterns of Growth and Development in Cattle (ed. de Boer, H. and Martin, J.), Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine, vol. 2, pp. 219–229. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. R. & Bergstrom, P. L. (1976). Anatomical jointing, tissue separation and weight recording proposed as the E.E.C. standard method for beef. Memorandum for the scientific sub-group, ‘Carcass and Meat Quality’, of the E.E.C. programme for coordination of research on beef production (mimeo).Google Scholar
Wood, J. D., Gregory, N. G., Hall, G. M. & Lister, D. (1977). Fat mobilization in Pietrain and Large White pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 37, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, J. D., MacFie, H. J. H., Pomeroy, R. W. & Twinn, D. J. (1980). Carcass composition in four sheep breeds: the importance of breed type and stage of maturity. Animal Production 30, 135–152.Google Scholar
Wyatt, R. D., Lusby, K. S., Gould, M. B., Walters, L. E., Whiteman, J. V. & Totusek, R. (1977). Feedlot performance and carcass traits of progeny of Hereford, Hereford × Holstein and Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 45, 1131–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar