Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:07:58.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on the ventilation of cattle byres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. D. Findlay
J. D. Findlay
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

1. The ventilation of two byres, one of large (1248 cu.ft.) and one of small (567 cu.ft.) cubic capacity per cow, was studied. The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere was used as a measure of the rate of air change and the dry katathermometer to determine the cooling power of the atmosphere. Temperatures and relative humidities were recorded and the actual air movements were studied by using smoke trails. The investigations were made under a variety of weather conditions and with a wide range of outlet and inlet areas.

2. It was shown that the atmospheric conditions in the large byre were almost always superior to those in the small byre, and this was undoubtedly due to the greater cubic space per cow in the large byre. Adequate ventilation was, however, readily attained in the small byre provided the outlet area was sufficiently large.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , October 1948 , pp. 411 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armsby, H. P. & Kriss, H. N. (1931). J. Agric. Sci. 21, 350.Google Scholar
Bender, C. B. (1928). Ann. Rep. N. J. Agric. Exp. Sta. 28, 120.Google Scholar
Brooks, H. J. (1931). J. Dairy Sci. 19, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxtorf, A. (1942). Inaugural Dissertation, Zürich, p. 1.Google Scholar
Clarkson, W. B., Smith, L. J. & Ives, F. W. (1918). Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engng, 12, 282.Google Scholar
Davis, R. N., Harland, F. G., Caster, A. B. & Kellner, R. H. (1947). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dice, J. R. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dober, W. (1939). Inaugural Dissertation, Zürich.Google Scholar
Douglas, C. (1911). Trans. Highl. Agric. Soc. Scot. 23, 170.Google Scholar
Eriksen, K. (1936). Svensk. VetTidskr. 41, 51.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, F. L. (1932). Agric. Engng, Ames, la, 12, 321.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W. & Kriss, H. N. (1926). J. Agric. Res. 33, 579.Google Scholar
Hays, W. P. (1926). J. Dairy Sci. 9, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, J. (1913). Trans. Highl. Agric. Soc. Scot. 25, 79.Google Scholar
Hendry, N. F. & Johnson, A. (1920). J. Agric. Res. 20, 405.Google Scholar
Hill, L. E. (1919). Spec. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 32.Google Scholar
Industrial Health Research Board (1930). Rep. p. 58.Google Scholar
Kelley, M. A. R. (1930). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 187.Google Scholar
Kelley, M. A. R. & Rupel, I. W. (1937). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 591.Google Scholar
King, F. H. (1908). Ventilation for Dwellings, Rural Schools and Stables. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Linton, R. G. (1934). Veterinary Hygiene. Edinburgh: Greene.Google Scholar
Lozinsky, E. (1923). Amer. J. Physiol. 67, 388.Google Scholar
Marcker, M. (1869). J. Landw. Jahrg. 17, 224.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1920). Spec. Rep. Ser. no. 52.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1923). Spec. Rep. Ser. no. 73.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1926). Spec. Rep. Ser. no. 150.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1945). Post-War Building Studies, No. 17. Farm Buildings. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Nohrman, G. (1939). Svensk. VetTidskr. 44, 122.Google Scholar
Parchim-Cords, W. (1947). Der Gesunde Stall. Berlin: Verlag des Druckhauses Tempelhof.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C. & Brody, S. (1922). J. Dairy Sci. 5, 212.Google Scholar
Reagan, W. N. & Richardson, G. A. (1938). J. Dairy Sci. 21, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Farm Buildings Committee (1946). Post War Building Studies, No. 22. Farm Buildings for Scotland. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Seath, D. M. & Millar, G. D. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 29, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speirs, J. (1909). Trans. Highl. Agric. Soc. Scot. 21, 255.Google Scholar
Sybel, H. Von & Ober, J. (1942). Berl. Münch. tierärztl. Wschr. 23, 19.Google Scholar
Traub, E. (1933). Z. InfektKr. Haustiere, 45, 1.Google Scholar
Weaver, E. & Matthews, C. A. (1928). Res. Bull. la. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 107.Google Scholar
Winslow, C. E. A., Herrington, L. P. & Gagge, A. P. (1937). Amer. J. Hyg. 26, 103.Google Scholar