Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:42:56.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The evaluation under grazing of legumes associated with Andropogon gayanus in a tropical savannah environment on the central plateau of Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Thomas
Affiliation:
Collaborative Project EMBRAPA-CIAT-IICA CPAG, C.P. 70.0023, Planaltina, D.F., Brazil
R. P. de Andrade
Affiliation:
Collaborative Project EMBRAPA-CIAT-IICA CPAG, C.P. 70.0023, Planaltina, D.F., Brazil

Summary

The persistence and productivity under grazing of seven accessions of Stylosanthes macrocephala, Zornia latifolia and Zornia brasiliensis in combination with Andropogon gayanus (cv. Planaltina) were investigated in small plots at two stocking rates on a low fertility, acid oxisol in the tropical savannah of the centre-west region of Brazil.

Two new accessions of S. macrocephala CIAT 2039 (CPAC 1033) and CIAT 2053 (CPAC 1034) were more productive and persistent than the control cultivar Pioneiro. After 4 years there were no differences in dry-matter yield between the two accessions. No anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) problems were noted in these accessions. Animals refused to graze Z. brasiliensis accessions at any time during the trial. Stocking rate effects became pronounced over time and legume contents were highest in the treatment grazed at 3·0 animals/ha. The advantages of the small-plot grazing method used in the experiment are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1984). A forage legume is born. CIAT International 3, 35.Google Scholar
Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (1984). Annual Report of the Tropical Pastures Programme 1983, pp. 1375. Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. & Jones, R. M. (1978). The ecology of Siratro-based pastures. In Plant Relations in Pastures (ed. Wilson, J. R.), pp. 353367. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M., Jones, R. J. & Hutton, E. M. (1980). A method for advanced stage evaluation of pasture species: a case study with bred lines of Macroptilium atropurpureum. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 20, 703709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D. A., McIvor, J. G. & McLean, R. W. (1984). The chemical composition and nutritive value of Stylosanthes. In The Biology and Agronomy of Stylosanthes (ed. Stace, Helen M. and Edye, L. A.), pp. 381403. Sydney, Australia: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladines, O. & Lascano, C. (1983). Recomendaciones para evaluar germoplasma bajo pastoreo en pequeños potreros. In Germoplasma Forrajero bajo pastoreo en pequeñas parcelas. Metodologías de Evaluación (ed. Paladines, O. and Lascano, C.), pp. 165183. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Sánchez, P. A. & Isbell, R. F. (1979). A comparison of the soils of tropical Latin America and tropical Australia. In Pasture Production in Acid Soils of the Tropics (ed. Sánchez, P. A. and Tergas, L. E.), pp. 2553. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Schultze-Kraft, R., Costa, N. M. S. & Flores, A. (1984). Stylosanthes macrocephala M. B. Ferr. et S. Costa – collection and preliminary agronomic evaluation of a new tropical pasture legume. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 61, 230240.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. & Andrade, R. P. de (1984). The persistence of tropical grass-legume associations under grazing in Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 257263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D., Andrade, R. P. de, Couto, W., Moore, C. P. & Rocha, C. M. C. da (1983). Pasture development in the tropical savanna region of Brazil. World Review of Animal Production 19, 3744.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar