Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:43:47.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The estimation of the intake of grazing sheep II. Application of faecal nitrogen regressions to a group of grazing sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. R. Pearce ,
J. E. Vercoe  and
D. E. Tribe
G. R. Pearce
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Centre, Werribee, Victoria
J. E. Vercoe
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Centre, Werribee, Victoria
D. E. Tribe
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Melbourne, Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Recordings of faecal organic matter (O.M.), faecal N% (O.M. basis) and live weight, were made over 52 consecutive weekly periods on ten Corriedale wethers grazing a pasture consisting mainly of Wimmera rye-grass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) with some subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) in a Mediterranean-type environment. The amount of available O.M. and its N% were also recorded.

2. By applying regressions of (i) the ratio of O.M. feed intake to O.M. faecal output on faecal N% and (ii) the N% in the O.M. intake on faecal N%, to the above observations it was possible to estimate the following quantities: O.M. and digestible organic matter (D.O.M.) intake, N and digestible N intake and O.M. digestibility percentage.

3. The patterns of O.M. and D.O.M. intake, and N and digestible N intake are described. Similar patterns exist for each of these quantities. Two maxima, a large one in the spring and a smaller one in the autumn, and two minima, one in the summer and one in the winter, are exhibited. The values for these various maxima and minima are presented in the text.

4. Attention is drawn to variations from the general pattern for these quantities and factors which could influence these patterns are mentioned.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , November 1962 , pp. 349 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1940). Official and Tentative Methods of Analysis, 5th ed. (Assoc. Off. Agric. Chemists: Washington).Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Corbett, J. L. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Corbett, J. L. & McDonald, I. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardison, W. A., Reid, J. T., Martin, C. M. & Wool-Folk, P. G. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 37, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W. K., Carter, A. H. & Lancaster, R. J. (1959). N.Z.J. Agric. Res. 2, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, R. J. (1954). N. Z. J. Sci. Tech. A. 36, 15.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Kemp, C. D. (1961). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 16, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Raymond, W. F. (1958). Rep. Exp. Grassl. Res. Inst. Hurley, 10, 92.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Kemp, C. D., Kemp, A. W. & Harris, C. E. (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vercoe, J. E., Pearce, G. R. & Tribe, D. E. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Vercoe, J. E., Tribe, D. E. & Pearce, G. R. (1961). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 12, 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1959). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 10, 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar