Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:13:20.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental temperature, energy metabolism and heat regulation in sheep. III. The metabolism and thermal exchanges of sheep with fleeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. L. Blaxter
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
N. McC. Graham
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
F. W. Wainman
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr

Extract

1. Fifteen calorimetric experiments were made with three sheep which had fleeces varying in thickness from 2·5 to 12 cm. All sheep received a constant ration, which corresponded in amount and kind to that given to closely clipped sheep in previous experiments (Graham et al. 1958).

2. The metabolizable energy of the food increased with increasing environmental temperature by 2–3 Cal./24 hr./° C.

3. Heat production remained constant throughout the range of 15–35° C. environmental temperature. Above 35° C. an increase occurred. At 11° C. a slight rise in heat production occurred in the sheep with a 2·5 cm. fleece. These results show that sheep with fleeces, in contrast to closely clipped sheep, have very wide thermoneutral zones.

4. Heat losses by vaporization of water converged to an identical value irrespective of fleece length at 40° C. The rate of increase of vaporization with environmental temperature at lower temperatures decreased as the fleece length increased.

5. Respiratory frequencies for given total watervapour losses were the same whether or not the sheep had a fleece.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC., Walkman, F. W. & Armstrong, D. G. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, A. C. & Edholm, O. G. (1955). Man in a Gold Environment. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Wainman, F. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Armstrong, D. G. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 25.Google Scholar
Hammel, H. T. (1955). Amer. J. Physiol. 182, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (1949). 31st edition, C. D. Hodgman, editor. Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Irving, L. & Krog, J. (1955). J. Appl. Phys. 7, 355.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. J. & Robinson, K. W. (1954). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 5, 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholander, P. F., Walters, V., Hock, R. & Irving, L. (1950). Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, 99, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar