Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:33:38.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The efficiency of food utilization for egg production by pullets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. Bolton
W. Bolton
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, 9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The efficiency of food utilization for egg production by pullets has been determined for two diets, one high in energy and the other low.

2. Both groups laid at the same rate (245 eggs/bird) throughout the year.

3. Birds fed the low-energy diet ate more food, but the intakes of digestible protein, non-protein digestible energy and metabolizable energy were the same for both groups.

4. The cost of food perton was higher for the high-energy diet; per bird per year it was the same for both groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , February 1958 , pp. 97 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baldini, J. T. & Rosenberg, H. R. (1955). Poult. Sci. 34, 1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, W. (1953). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Official Methods (1955). Fertilizers and Feeding Stuffs Regulations. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dymza, H., Boucher, R. V. & McCartney, M. G. (1954). Poult. Sci. 33, 1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., Emmanuelson, H. & Fransson, A. (1949). LantbrHögsk. Ann. 16, 749.Google Scholar
Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs Regulations. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Fraps, G. S. (1946). Bull. Texas Agric. Expt. Sta. no. 678.Google Scholar
Heuser, G. F., Norris, L. C., Peeler, H. T. & Scott, M. L. (1945). Poult. Sci. 24, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W. (1956). Poult. Sci. 35, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W., Anderson, D. L. & Dansky, L. M. (1956). Poult. Sci. 35, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, I. & Godden, W. (1941). Tech. Commun. Bur. Anim. Nutr., Aberd., no. 14.Google Scholar
Lillie, R. J., Haynes, S. K. & Bird, H. R. (1951). Poult. Sci. 30, 922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matterson, L. D., Potter, L. M., Stenson, L. D. & Singsen, E. P. (1955). Poult. Sci. 34, 1210.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1939). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48.Google Scholar