Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:31:59.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of seed size, autumn nitrogen and plant population density on the response to delayed sowing in winter oil-seed rape (Brassica napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. J. Mendham
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD
P. A. Shipway
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD
R. K. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD

Summary

The aim of the experiments reported here was to investigate the possibility of minimizing yield losses due to late sowing by increasing leaf area and radiation interception during the pre-flowering period. The use of large seed did increase leaf area, radiation interception and crop weight at flowering. Normally this would be expected to lead to increased yield of late sowings, but hot, dry conditions severely affected all crops during seed growth. Applying fertilizer nitrogen in the seed bed boosted pre-flowering growth of early but not late sowings, probably because low temperatures prevented a response in the latter. Increasing plant population density did improve leaf cover and radiation interception until just before flowering, but leaf canopies in late-sown, low density crops were then able to expand more and function for longer owing to less shading by flowers and pods. Seed retention was improved and, even with as few as 8 plants/m3 in 1973–4, a worthwhile yield was still obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Development And Advisory Service (1978). Oil-seed Rape. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service Leaflet GFO 23, London.Google Scholar
Helps, M. B. (1971). Method of sowing, seed rate and nitrogen level for oil-seed rape. Experimental Husbandry 20, 6972.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. K. J. & Ainsley, A. M. (1978). Seed-bed fertiliser requirements of winter oil-seed rape. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 657666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loof, B. (1963). Ekologiska undersökningar rörande âkerbruksväxternas övervintring. 1. Höstoljeväxter. Sveriges Utsädesförening Tidshrift 73, 25100.Google Scholar
Mendham, N. J. & Scott, R. K. (1975). The limiting effect of plant size at inflorescence initiation on subsequent growth and yield of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 487502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. A. & Scott, R. K. (1981). The effects of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 389416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordestgaard, A. (1965). Sowing quantity and harvest-time experiments with winter rape. Tidsskriftfor Planteavl, Kjøbenhavn 69, 126134.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K., Ogunremi, E. A., Ivins, J. D. & Mendham, N. J. (1973 a). The effect of sowing date and season on growth and yield of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 277285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. K., Ogunremi, E. A., Ivins, J. D. & Mendham, N. J. (1973 b). The effect of fertilisers and harvest date on growth and yield of oil-seed rape sown in autumn and spring. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 287293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torssell, B. (1959). Hardiness and survival of winter rape and winter turnip rape. Department of Plant Husbandry (Crop Production). Royal School of Agriculture, Sweden, Publication no. 15.Google Scholar
Wood, D. W., Longden, P. C. & Scott, R. K. (1977). Seed size variation; its extent, source and significance in field crops. Seed Science and Technology 5, 337352.Google Scholar