Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:38:34.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of seed advancement and sowing date on establishment, bolting and yield of sugarbeet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. J. Durrant ,
S. J. Mash  and
K. W. Jaggard
M. J. Durrant
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP, UK
S. J. Mash
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP, UK
K. W. Jaggard
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An advancing and devernalizing treatment for sugarbeet seed has been developed which, in England, allows sowing to be brought forward safely by c. 10 days to around 10 March. Experiments done each year from 1988 to 1991 were used to assess the value of this change. They showed that sugar yield increased by 0·048 t/ha/day because seed advancement resulted in more rapid emergence, and by 0·042 t/ha/day as a result of earlier sowing. As an average of all appropriate data from experiments in England since the 1950s, the advantage of sowing in March is 0·035 t/ha/day. However, the actual change in sowing date which the farmer might achieve will depend on soil type and rainfall. Daily rainfall and evaporation data for eastern England in March and April were used to predict the number and distribution of available machinery work days. On this basis, the average sowing date was predicted to advance by 9 days. Thus the sugar yield improvement which could be produced by advancing and devernalizing beet seed is equivalent to 9 days at 0·035 t/ha/day, plus 0·19 t/ha, or c. 0·5 t/ha. In practice, this should translate into an increase of 0·35 t/ha, or c. 5% of the average yield.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 121 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 333 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Draycott, A. P., Webb, D. J. & Wright, E. M. (1973). The effect of time of sowing and harvesting on growth, yield and nitrogen fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. I. Yield and nitrogen uptake at harvest. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. J. (1988). A survey of seedling establishment in sugar-beet crops in 1980 and 1981. Annals of Applied Biology 113, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. J. & Jaggard, K. W. (1988). Sugar-beet seed advancement to increase establishment and decrease bolting. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. J. & Mash, S. J. (1990). Sugar-beet seed treatments and early sowing. Seed Science and Technology 18, 839–850.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J. & Mash, S. J. (1992). Interactions between seed treatments. Institute of Arable Crops Research Report for 1991, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Dunning, R. A., Jaggard, K. W., Bugg, R. B. & Scott, R. K. (1988). A census of seedling establishment in sugar-beet crops. Annals of Applied Biology 113, 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummerson, R. J. (1986). The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. C. & Adams, S. N. (1966). The effect of sowing date, harvest date and fertilizer rate on sugar beet. Experimental Husbandry 14, 65–74.Google Scholar
Hornsey, K. G. & Arnold, M. H. (1979). The origins of weed beet. Annals of Applied Biology 92, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, R. & Webb, D. J. (1970). The effect of sowing date and harvesting date on the yield of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. (1979). The effect of plant distribution on yield of sugar beet. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Jaggard, K. W., Wickens, R., Webb, D. J. & Scott, R. K. (1983). Effects of sowing date on plant establishment and bolting and the influence of these factors on yields of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longden, P. C. (1989). Effects of increasing weed-beet density on sugar-beet yield and quality. Annals of Applied Biology 114, 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, J. W. F. & Durrant, M. J. (1990). Progress in seed quality and seed treatments. British Sugar Beet Review 58 (4), 4–6.Google Scholar
Purvis, O. N. (1961). The physiological analysis of vernalisation. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology (Ed. Ruhland, W.), Vol. 16, pp. 76–122. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Jaggard, K. W. (1992). Crop growth and weather: can yield forecasts be reliable? In Proceedings of the 55th Winter Congress of the Institut International de Recherches Betteravières, pp. 169–187. Brussels: IIRB.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K., English, S. D., Wood, D. W. & Unsworth, M. H. (1973). The yield of sugar beet in relation to weather and length of growing season. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steven, M. D., Biscoe, P. V., Jaggard, K. W. & Paruntu, J. (1986). Foliage cover and radiation interception. Field Crops Research 13, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A. J. (1982). Soil and climatic aspects of workability and trafficability. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation. Osijek, Yugoslavia: ISTRO.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1956). Leaf growth in relation to crop yield. In The Growth of Leaves (Ed. Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 178–191. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Wind, G. P. (1976). Application of analog and numerical models to investigate the influence of drainage on workability in spring. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 24, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar