Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:32:53.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of potassium and magnesium fertilizers on yield and size distribution of potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. Simpson ,
P. Crooks  and
S. McIntosh
K. Simpson
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
P. Crooks
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
S. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Thirteen field experiments were made during 6 years on seed-potato growing farms in south-east Scotland, comparing three rates, 70, 140 and 280 kg K/ha as potassium chloride and four rates of 0–54 kg Mg/ha as kieserite in 3 × 4 factorial experiments.

More than 70 kg/ha of potassium increased total yield only at one site, which had a recent history of low K application and very low available K. Yields were decreased by more than 70 kg/ha of potassium at three sites in a season with abnormally dry conditions just after planting. Applied magnesium had little effect on total yield.

Extra potassium increased ware yield but decreased seed yield, both consistently, probably because the fertilizer damaged some stolons at or before tuber initiation and fewer tubers developed. The ware/seed ratio was generally increased by extra K, but after the dry spring this ratio was unaltered or reduced. Applied magnesium had little effect on the ratio.

Our results suggest that the present rates of K fertilizer, used for commercial seed-potato crops (114–138 kg K/ha) in south-east Scotland are excessive, and a much lower rate of approximately 70 kg K/ha would be adequate except on very low K sites.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , June 1973 , pp. 369 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, J. A., Devine, J. R. & Holmes, M. R. J. (1966). Field experiments on the magnesium requirement of cereals, potatoes and sugar beet in relation to nitrogen and potassium application. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 17, 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, J. A., Devine, J. R., Holmes, M. R. J. & Whitear, J. D. (1967). Field experiments on the fertilizer requirements of maincrop potatoes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A. & Dermott, W. (1967). Fertilizer requirements of potatoes in relation to kind of soil and soil analysis. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 18, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickins, J. C., Harrap, F. E. G. & Holmes, M. R. J. (1962). Field experiments comparing the effects of muriate and sulphate of potash on potato yield and quality. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59, 319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, G. H. A. (1967). An evaluation of crop response to magnesium in the West Midlands 1952–58. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish Fd. 14, 147–59.Google Scholar
Hende, A. van den, Cottenie, A. & Jonghe, P. de. (1953). The value of some methods for chemical soil analysis applied to different Belgian soil types. Trans, int. Soc. Soil Sci. Comm. II and IV 2, 307–17.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. (1965). Effects of type of potash and rates of nitrogen, phosphate and potassium in fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of potato crops. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16, 480–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M. R. J. (1962). Field experiments on the magnesium requirement of potatoes in Great Britain. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 281–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, W. M. (1966). Effect of soil applications of potassium, magnesium sulphate and magnesium sulphate spray on potato yield, composition and nutrient intake. Am. Potato J. 43, 403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milthorpe, F. L. (1963). Somo aspects of plant growth. In The Growth of the Potato. Proc. 10th Easter Sch. agric. Sci. Univ. Nott., pp. 3–16. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Peeler, C. H. & Heafield, T. G. (1966). Magnesium for potatoes and sugar beet. Expl Husb. 13, 20–24.Google Scholar
Pizer, N. H., Wright, H. A., Caldwell, T. H., Hargrave, J., Burgess, G. R., Cory, V. & Boyd, D. A. (1961). A study of peat fenlands with particular reference to potato manuring. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reith, J. W. S. & Inkson, R. H. E. (1958). The effects of fertilizers and dung on potatoes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 51, 218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, K. (1962). Effects of soil-moisture tension and fertilizers on the yield, growth and phosphorus uptake of potatoes. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 13, 237–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, K. & Crooks, P. (1961). Effects of fertilizers on the yield of potatoes in S. E. Scotland. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 131–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Survey Of Fertilizer Practice In Scotland, 1956. Report No. 3, East Lothian (Lowground); Report No.6, Angus (Brechin). Edinburgh and East of Scotland College of Agriculture and A. R. C. Unit of Statistics, Aberdeen.Google Scholar