Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:42:55.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of stocking rate on grazing behaviour and diet selection of goats on cultivated pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2018

L. Q. Wan ,
K. S. Liu ,
W. Wu ,
J. S. Li ,
T. C. Zhao ,
X. Q. Shao ,
F. He ,
H. Lv  and
X. L. Li
L. Q. Wan
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China 100193, China
K. S. Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China 100193, China
W. Wu
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China 100193, China
J. S. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China 100193, China
T. C. Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China 100193, China
X. Q. Shao
Affiliation:
Department of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China 100193, China
F. He
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China 100193, China
H. Lv
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China 100193, China
X. L. Li*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China 100193, China
*
Author for correspondence: K.S. Liu, E-mail: [email protected] and X.L. Li, E-mail: [email protected]
Author for correspondence: K.S. Liu, E-mail: [email protected] and X.L. Li, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cultivated pastures in southern China are being used to improve forage productivity and animal performance, but studies on grazing behaviour of goats in these cultivated pastures are still rare. In the current study, the grazing behaviour of Yunling black goats under low (5 goats/ha) and high (15 goats/ha) stocking rates (SRs) was evaluated. Data showed that the proportion of time goats spent on activities was: eating (0.59–0.87), ruminating (0.05–0.35), walking (0.03–0.06) and resting (0.01–0.03). Compared with low SR, goats spent more time eating and walking, and less time ruminating and resting under high SR. Goats had similar diet preferences under both SR and preferred to eat grasses (ryegrass and cocksfoot) more than a legume (white clover). The distribution of eating time on each forage species was more uniform under high v. low SR. Bites/step, bite weight and daily intake were greater under low than high SR. Results suggest that the SR affects grazing behaviour of goats on cultivated pasture, and identifying an optimal SR is critical for increasing bite weight and intake.

Keywords

Cultivated pasturediet selectiongrazing behaviourintakestocking rate
Type
Animal Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 7 , September 2018 , pp. 914 - 921
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez-Rodriguez, J, Sanz, A, Delfa, R, Revilla, R and Joy, M (2007) Performance and grazing behaviour of Churra Tensina sheep stocked under different management systems during lactation on Spanish mountain pastures. Livestock Science 107, 152–161.Google Scholar
Animut, G, Goetsch, AL, Aiken, GE, Puchala, R, Detweiler, G, Krehbiel, CR, Merkel, RC, Sahlu, T, Dawson, LJ, Johnson, ZB and Gipson, TA (2005) Grazing behavior and energy expenditure by sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates. Small Ruminant Research 59, 191–201.Google Scholar
Askar, AR, Gipson, TA, Puchala, R, Tesfai, K, Detweiler, GD, Asmare, A, Keli, A, Sahlu, T and Goetsch, AL (2013) Effects of stocking rate and physiological state of meat goats grazing grass/forb pastures on forage intake, selection, and digestion, grazing behavior, and performance. Livestock Science 154, 82–92.Google Scholar
Basha, NAD, Scogings, PF, Dziba, LE and Nsahlai, IV (2012) Diet selection of Ngunigoats in relation to season, chemistry and physical properties of browse in sub-humid subtropical savanna. Small Ruminant Research 102, 163–171.Google Scholar
Burns, JC and Sollenberger, LE (2002) Grazing behavior of ruminants and daily performance from warm-season grasses. Crop Science 42, 873–881.Google Scholar
Chen, XJ, Hou, FJ, Matthew, C and He, XZ (2010) Stocking rate effects on metabolizable energy intake and grazing behaviour of Tan sheep in steppe grassland on the Loess Plateau of Northwest China. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 709–721.Google Scholar
Decandia, M, Sitzia, M, Cabiddu, A, Kababya, D and Molle, G (2000) The use of polyethylene glycol to reduce the anti-nutritional effects of tannins in goats fed woody species. Small Ruminant Research 38, 157–164.Google Scholar
Dziba, LE, Scogings, PF, Gordon, IJ and Raats, JG (2003) Effects of season and breed on browse species intake rates and diet selection by goats in the False Thornveld of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Small Ruminant Research 47, 17–30.Google Scholar
Fernandes, MHMR, Fernandes Junior, JS, de Resende, KT, Bonfa, HC, Reis, RA, Ruggieri, AC, Fernandes, JJR and Santos, PM (2016) Grazing behavior and intake of goats rotationally grazing Tanzania-grass pasture with different post-grazing residues. Tropical Grasslands – Forrajes Tropicales 4, 91–100.Google Scholar
Gutman, M, Henkin, Z, Holzer, Z, Noy-Meir, I and Seligman, NG (2000) A case study of beef-cattle grazing in a Mediterranean-type woodland. Agroforestry Systems 48, 119–140.Google Scholar
Iussig, G, Lonati, M, Probo, M, Hodge, S and Lombardi, G (2015) Plant species selection by goats foraging on montane semi-natural grasslands and grazable forestlands in the Italian Alps. Italian Journal of Animal Science 14, 484–494.Google Scholar
Kababya, D, Perevolotsky, A, Bruckental, I and Landau, S (1998) Selection of diets by dual-purpose Mamber goats in Mediterranean woodland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131, 221–228.Google Scholar
Lin, LJ, Dickhoefer, U, Müller, K, Wurina, and Susenbeth, A (2011) Grazing behavior of sheep at different stocking rates in the Inner Mongolian steppe, China. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 129, 36–42.Google Scholar
Liu, K, Sollenberger, LE, Newman, YC, Vendramini, JMB, Interrante, SM and White-Leech, R (2011) Grazing management effects on productivity, nutritive value, and persistence of ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass. Crop Science 51, 353–360.Google Scholar
Manousidis, T, Kyriazopoulos, AP, Parissi, ZM, Abraham, EM, Korakis, G and Abas, Z (2016) Grazing behavior, forage selection and diet composition of goats in a Mediterranean woody rangeland. Small Ruminant Research 145, 142–153.Google Scholar
Meuret, M (1997) Prehensibilite des aliments chez les petits ruminants surparcours en landes et sous-bois (Food harvesting by small ruminants eating on rangeland and woodland undergrowth, in French, with English summary). INRA Productions Animales 10, 391–401.Google Scholar
Mills, AJ, Cowling, RM, Fey, MV, Kerley, GIH, Donaldson, JS, Lechmere-Oertel, RG, Sigwela, AM, Skowno, AL and Rundel, P (2005) Effects of goat pastoralism on ecosystem carbon storage in semiarid thicket, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Austral Ecology 30, 797–804.Google Scholar
National Soil Survey Office (1998) Chinese Soils (in Chinese). Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Ngwa, AT, Pone, DK and Mafeni, JM (2000) Feed selection and dietary preferences of forage by small ruminants grazing natural pastures in the Sahelian zone of Cameroon. Animal Feed Science and Technology 88, 253–266.Google Scholar
Ouedraogo-Kone, S, Kabore-Zoungrana, CY and Ledin, I (2006) Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle on natural pasture in the sub-humid zone of West Africa. Livestock Science 105, 244–252.Google Scholar
Perevolotsky, A, Landau, S, Kababia, D and Ungar, ED (1998) Diet selection in dairy goats grazing woody Mediterranean rangeland. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57, 117–131.Google Scholar
Pittarello, M, Gorlier, A, Lombardi, G and Lonati, M (2017) Plant species selection by sheep in semi-natural dry grasslands extensively grazed in the south-western Italian Alps. The Rangeland Journal 39, 123–131.Google Scholar
Pontes, LD, Agreil, C, Magda, D, Gleizes, B and Fritz, H (2010) Feeding behaviour of sheep on shrubs in response to contrasting herbaceous cover in rangelands dominated by Cytisus scoparius L. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 124, 35–44.Google Scholar
Raeside, MC, Robertson, M, Nie, ZN, Partington, DL, Jacobs, JL and Behrendt, R (2017) Dietary choice and grazing behaviour of sheep on spatially arranged pasture systems. 1. Herbage mass, nutritive characteristics and diet selection. Animal Production Science 57, 697–709.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, MM, de Oliveira, ME, Leal, TM, de Moura, RL, Araujo, DL, dos Santos, MS, Rodrigues, FN and Rodrigues, VS (2016) Forage intake process of goats on a Massai grass pasture with different sward heights. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina 37, 4339–4348.Google Scholar
Roundy, BA and Ruyle, GB (1989) Effects of herbivory on Twig dynamics of a Sonoran desert shrub Simmondsia-Chinensis (Link) Schn. Journal of Applied Ecology 26, 701–710.Google Scholar
Sanon, HO, Kabore-Zoungrana, C and Ledin, I (2007) Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area. Small Ruminant Research 67, 64–74.Google Scholar
SAS (1989) SAS/STAT Guide. Release 6.12. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Inst..Google Scholar
Schiborra, A, Gierus, M, Wan, HW, Glindemann, T, Wang, CJ, Susenbeth, A and Taube, F (2010) Dietary selection of sheep grazing the semi-arid grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China at different grazing intensities. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94, 446–454.Google Scholar
Sharp, JM, Edwards, GR and Jeger, MJ (2012) Impact of the spatial scale of grass-legume mixtures on sheep grazing behaviour, preference and intake, and subsequent effects on pasture. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 6, 1848–1856.Google Scholar
Sollenberger, LE and Burns, JC (2001) Canopy characteristics, ingestive behaviour, and herbage intake in cultivated tropical grasslands. In Gomide, JA, Mattos, WRS and Da Silva, SC (eds), Proceedings of the 19th International Grassland Congress, São Pedro, Brazil, 10–21 February 2001. Piracicaba, Brazil: Brazilian Society of Animal Husbandry, pp. 321–327.Google Scholar
Sollenberger, LE and Vanzant, ES (2011) Interrelationships among forage nutritive value and quantity and individual animal performance. Crop Science 51, 420–432.Google Scholar
Sollenberger, LE, Agouridis, CT, Vanzant, ES, Franzluebbers, AJ and Owens, LB (2012) Prescribed grazing on pasturelands. In Nelson, CJ (ed.), Conservation Outcomes from Pastureland and Hayland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps. Lawrence, KS, USA: Allen Press, pp. 111–204.Google Scholar
Suttie, JM, Reynolds, SG and Batello, C (2005) Grasslands of the World. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Tolu, C, Alaturk, F, Parlak, AO and Gokkus, A (2017) Behaviour of sheep freely grazed on Gökçeada Island (Turkey) rangeland reclaimed by different methods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 155, 993–1004.Google Scholar
Wan, L, Li, X, Su, J and Bai, J (2000) Study on dietary composition and preference of goats on a shrubland in the Three Gorges Region of Yangtz River. Acta Agrestia Sinica 8, 186–192.Google Scholar
Yiakoulaki, MD, Goetsch, AL, Detweiler, GD and Sahlu, T (2014) Effects of creep grazing and stocking rate on forage selection and nutritive value of the diet for meat goat does and kids on grass/forb pasture. Small Ruminant Research 117, 119–123.Google Scholar