Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:18:24.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of plant density and detopping following silking on cob growth, fodder and grain yield of maize (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. K. Roy  and
P. K. Biswas
S. K. Roy
Affiliation:
Regional Agricultural Research Station, BARI, Hathazari, Chittagong, Bangladesh
P. K. Biswas
Affiliation:
Regional Agricultural Research Station, BARI, Hathazari, Chittagong, Bangladesh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Maize was grown al the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Hathazari, Bangladesh during 1988/89 and 1989/90 to study fodder yield, cob growth and grain yield together with the contribution of pre-silking stem reserves to grain. Population densities were 33300, 44400 and 66600 plants/ha. Plants were either detopped after silking and pollen shedding, keeping 0, 2 or 3 leaves above the cob, or were left entire.

The results showed that the maize crop could successfully be detopped for fodder with little or no adverse effect on grain yield. Fodder yield increased with increased plant density and among the detopping treatments the highest fodder yield was obtained when the plants were detopped just above the cob. Cob growth followed a sigmoid pattern and the highest dry weight per cob was obtained from the lowest plant density and from entire plants. The number of cobs/m2 increased with increased plant density but detopping treatments did not give any significant difference in relation to densities. The number of grains/cob was highest with 33300 plants/ha but, among the detopping treatments, plants detopped just above the cob had the lowest number of grains/cob in both years. Weight of 1000-grain decreased with increasing plant density but it was increased by detopping plants just above the cob during 1988/89, although it was decreased in 1989/90. The highest apparent translocation of pre-silking reserves was obtained using densities of 44400 plants/ha but detopping treatments did not show any consistent effect, although the highest apparent translocation (20%) and harvest index (58%) were obtained from plants detopped just above the cob.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 119 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 297 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. L., Kamprath, E. J., Moll, R. H. & Jackson, W. A. (1984). Effect of N fertilization on silk synchrony, ear number, and growth of semiprolific maize genotypes. Crop Science 24, 663–666.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. G., Williams, W. A. & Loomis, R. S. (1967). Tassels and the productivity of maize. Crop Science 7, 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egharevba, P. N. & Treharne, K. J. (1975). Canopy architecture and light distribution in maize. In Proceedings of the Physiological Progress Formulation Workshop. IITA.Google Scholar
Fisher, K. S. & Palmer, A. F. E. (1984). Tropical Maize. In The Physiology of Tropical Field Crops (Eds Goldsworthy, P. P. & Fisher, N. N.), pp. 213–248. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1975). Barley and its environment. V. Stability of grain weight. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 319–336.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, P. R. & Colegrove, M. (1974). Growth and yield of highland maize in Mexico. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 213–221.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, P. R., Palmer, A. F. E. & Sperling, D. W. (1974). Growth and yield of lowland tropical maize in Mexico. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 223–230.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. C. & Cooper, P. J. M. (1981). Growth, development and grain yield of maize. Experimental Agriculture 17, 203–207.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. B., Daynard, T. B., Hume, D. J., Tanner, J. W., Curtis, J. D. & Kannenburg, L. W. (1969). Effect of tassel removal on grain yield of corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Science 9, 405–406.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. C. (1976). Corn plant architecture. In Proceedings of the XXII Annual Meeting of the Central American Cooperation Programme for the Improvement of Food Crops, San Jose, Costa Rica: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1979). How Grasses Grow (2nd edn). Studies in Biology No. 34. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Locas, E. O. & Remison, S. U. (1984). Effect of population density on yield and dry matter partitioning in maize varieties in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 54, 284–290.Google Scholar
Major, D. J. & Daynard, T. B. (1972). Hyperbolic relation between leaf area index and plant population in corn (Zea mays). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 52, 112–115.Google Scholar
Muleba, N. (1980). Physiological determinants of grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) varieties in different environments. PhD thesis, Kansas State University, USA.Google Scholar
Paterniani, E. (1981). Influence of tassel size on ear placement in maize. Maydica XXVI, 85–89.Google Scholar
Roy, S. K. & Quasem, A. (1987). Effect of plant population and leaf pruning on yield and yield attributes of maize. Bangladesh Journal of Agronomy 2, 34–40.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M. & Daynard, T. B. (1978). Dry weight, soluble sugar content, and starch content of maize kernels during the early postsilking period. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 199–206.Google Scholar
Walker, G. K., Miller, M. H. & Tollenaar, M. (1988). Source-sink limitations of maize growing in an outdoor hydroponic system. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68, 947–955.Google Scholar