Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:39:54.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of nitrogen rates, mulching and antitranspirants on water use and water use efficiency of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties grown under dryland conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. K. Agarwal  and
Rajat De
S. K. Agarwal
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
Rajat De
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments were made under natural rainfall during the winter seasons of 1972–3 and 1973–4 at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to study the soil water use by barley varieties as influenced by nitrogen rates, mulching and foliar application of antitranspirants. Both Ratna and Vijaya varieties of barley had similar efficiency of water use.

Total water use was not much different for various treatments but straw mulch and kaolin decreased evapotranspiration at tillering and pre-flowering stages enabling the plants to use more water at critical stages of grain formation. Application of nitrogen, straw mulch and a foliar coating of kaolin increased the efficiency of water use.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 263 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Khaled, A., Hagan, R. M. & Davenport, D. C. (1970). Effects of kaolinite as a reflective antitranspirant on leaf temperature, transpiration, photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Water Resource Research 6, 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, S. K. (1974). Effect of straw mulch and antitranspirants on the water balance and yield of barley. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Agarwal, S. K. & De, R. (1977). Effect of application of nitrogen, mulching and antitranspirants on the growth and yield of barley under dryland conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 47, 191–194.Google Scholar
Bansal, S. P., Gajri, P. R. & Prihar, S. S. (1971). Effects of mulches on water conservation, soil temperature and growth of maize and pearl millet. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 41, 467–473.Google Scholar
De, Rajat & Giri, G. (1978). Effect of mulching and kaolin foliar spray on mung (Vigna radiata) – rapeseed (Brassica campestris) double cropping system under rainfed conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doraiswamy, P.C. & Rosenberg, N. J. (1974). Reflectant induced modification of soybean canopy radiation balance. I. Preliminary test with kaolinite reflectant. Agronomy Journal 66, 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuehring, H. D. (1975). Yield of dryland grain sorghum as affected by antitranspirants, nitrogen and contributing micro-watershed. Agronomy Journal 67, 255–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koshi, P. T. & Fryrear, D. W. (1971). Effect of seed bed configuration and cotton bur mulch on lint cotton yield, soil, water and water use. Agronomy Journal 63, 817–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, Ratan (1974). Soil temperature, soil moisture and maize yield from mulched and unmulched tropical soils. Plant and Soil 40, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, R. A., Thompson, C. A., Grabouski, P. H.Stukenholtz, D. D., Frank, K. D. & Dreier, A. F. (1964). Water requirement of grain crops as modified by fertilizer use. Agronomy Journal 45, 529–532.Google Scholar
Patil, B. B. & De, R. (1976). Influence of antitranspirants on rapeseed (Brassica campestris) plants under water stressed and nonstressed conditions. Plant Physiology 57, 941–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patil, B. B. & De, R. (1978). Studies on the effect of nitrogen fertilizer, row spacing and use of antitranspirants on rapeseed (Brassica campestris) grown under dryland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichman, G. A. & Grunes, D. L. (1966). Effect of water regimes and fertilization on barley growth, water use and N and P uptake. Agronomy Journal 58, 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatyer, R. O. & Bierhuizen, J. F. (1964). The influence of several transpiration suppressants on transpiration, photosynthesis and water use efficiency of cotton leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Science 17, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viets, F. C. (1966). Increasing water use efficiency by soil management, pp. 259–274. In Pierre, W. H. et al. (eds.). Plant Environment and Efficient Water Use. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Waggoner, P. E. (1966). Decreasing transpiration and the effect upon growth. In Plant Environment and Efficient Water Use. (Ed. Pierre, W. H. et al. ) Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Warder, F. G., Lehane, J. J., Hinman, W. C. & Staple, W. J. (1963). The effect of fertilizer on growth, nutrient uptake and moisture use of wheat on two soils in South-Western Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 43, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelitch, I. & Waggoner, P. E. (1962). Effect of chemical control of stomata and transpiration of intact plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A. 48, 1297–1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed