Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:30:13.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of interval between harvests and nitrogen application on the proportion and yield of crop fractions and on the digestibility and digestible yield and nitrogen content and yield of two perennial ryegrass varieties in the second harvest year

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
A. Koocheki
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
A. B. Lwoga
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth

Summary

The effect of six intervals between harvests and three levels of N application on the dry-matter yield of total herbage, the proportion and yield of green leaf, dead leaf, ‘stem’ and inflorescence of the sown species, the proportion and yield of unsown species, the digestibility and digestible yield and N content and yield was studied in S. 23 and S. 321 perennial ryegrass during a 30-week period in the second harvest year in a field experiment. In S. 23 the ‘stem’ was divided into true stem, leaf sheath, unemerged leaf and unemerged inflorescence.

The results supported the main findings from the first harvest year (Wilman et al. 1976a, b).

There was marked ingress of unsown species in the second harvest year with 3-, 4- and 5-week intervals in S. 321. The combination of 262–5 or 525 kg N/ha/year and 8- and particularly 10-week intervals over 2 years was too severe a treatment for the satisfactory survival of S. 23. With 525 kg N and 10-week intervals, S. 321 was equally badly affeoted.

The application of 525 kg N/ha/year compared with nil reduced the proportion of green leaf in total herbage of the sown species by 11 percentage units, on average, and increased the proportion of ‘stem’ by 12 percentage units, in the second harvest year. The effect of N application on the proportion of crop fractions was found in both varieties and in all months of harvest. The effect was much greater than in the first harvest year. In S. 23 the application of 525 kg N compared with nil in the second harvest year increased the proportions of both true stem and leaf sheath (in total herbage of the sown species), true stem being the more important of the two, in this context, with the longer intervals and leaf sheath being the more important with the short intervals.

Digestibility was not in general affected by N application despite the higher proportion of stem and leaf sheath and the lower proportion of green leaf blade resulting from N application. N did, however, tend to reduce digestibility at the harvests at which the proportion of stem was highest.

Digestibility varied from one time of the year to another with a constant interval between harvests, but not as much as in the previous year. Lower digestibility of leafy crops in summer and autumn than in April and early May in both years may have been partly due to a higher proportion of dead material.

Three periods were distinguished approximately in both years: May-June, July-August, and September-October. Only in the first of these periods was there a substantial increase in yield of digestible organic matter as a result of doubling the interval between harvests. Doubling the interval reduced digestibility in all three periods, but especially at harvests within the second period. Yield response to N was large in the first period, intermediate in the second, and low in the third. Apparent recovery of N was low and N content of herbage unduly high in the third period. N content of herbage was low with the long intervals between harvests at harvests in the first two periods. Applied N increased N content at these harvests and at all other times.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, K. B. & Evans, P. S. (1973). Animal treading: A review of the work of the late D. B. Edmond. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1, 217–26.Google Scholar
Deinum, B., Van Es, A. J. H. & Van Soest, P. J. (1968). Climate, nitrogen and grass. II. The influence of light intensity, temperature and nitrogen on in vivo digestibility of grass and the prediction of these effects from some chemical procedures. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 16, 217–23.Google Scholar
Faithfull, N. T. (1971). Automated simultaneous determination of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium on the same herbage digest solution. Laboratory Practice 20, 41–4.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. K. (1974). Efficiency in grass production for grazing. Report of Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1973, pp. 111–16.Google Scholar
Laredo, M. A. & Minson, D. J. (1975). The voluntary intake and digestibility by sheep of leaf and stem fractions of Lolium perenne. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 73–7.Google Scholar
Leafe, E. L., Stiles, W. & Dickinson, S. E. (1974). Physiological processes influencing the pattern of productivity of the intensively managed grass sward. Proceedings XII International Grassland Congress, Moscow (in the Press).Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1972/1973). Recommended varieties of grasses. Farmers leaflet no. 16. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1969). The nutritive value of forage crops. Advances in Agronomy 21, 1108.Google Scholar
Shim, J. S. (1975). Leaf dimensions and productivity of varieties of Lolium perenne and Lolium multiflorum in response to nitrogen supply and frequency of cutting. M.Sc. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. & Deriaz, R. E. (1963). The use of rumenfistulated steers in the direct determination of nutritive value of ingested herbage in grazing experiments. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, R. A. & Tilley, J. M. A. (1964). The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sainfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–11.Google Scholar
Wilman, D., Droushiotis, D., Koocheki, A., Lwoga, A. B. & Shim, J. S. (1976a). The effect of interval between harvests and nitrogen application on the proportion and yield of crop fractions in four ryegrass varieties in the first harvest year. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 189203.Google Scholar
Wilman, D., Droushiotis, D., Koocheki, A., Lwoga, A. B. & Shim, J. S. (1976b). The effect of interval between harvests and nitrogen application on the digestibility and digestible yield and nitrogen content and yield of four ryegrass varieties in the first harvest year. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 393–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D., Koocheki, A., Lwoga, A. B., Drottshiotis, D. & Shim, J. S. (1976 c). The effect of interval between harvests and nitrogen application on the numbers and weights of tillers and leaves in four ryegrass varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge, 87, 4557.Google Scholar
Wilman, D., Ojuederie, B. M. & Asare, E. O. (1976). Nitrogen and Italian ryegrass. 3. Growth up to 14 weeks: yields, proportions, digestibilities and nitrogen contents of crop fractions, and tiller populations. Journal of the British Grassland Society 31, 73–9.Google Scholar