Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:06:54.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of drought on growth and water use of sugar beet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Kay F. Brown ,
A. B. Messem ,
R. J. Dunham  and
P. V. Biscoe
Kay F. Brown
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP
A. B. Messem
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP
R. J. Dunham
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP
P. V. Biscoe
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The growth and water use of sugar beet affected by early (ED) and late (LD) drought was compared with that of irrigated (I) and unirrigated (NI) controls. Mobile shelters were used to exclude rain from ED plots during June and July, and LD plots during August and September, respectively, whereas outside these periods the ED and LD plots were irrigated as necessary.

The ED treatment affected the fibrous roots severely. Many of the roots in the top 60 cm of soil died and development of the root system below this depth was slow. Expansion of the leaf canopy slowed, radiation interception was reduced and the rate of water use fell from about 1·2 times to 0·6 times Penman potential transpiration rate. The LD treatment, which was imposed when the fibrous root system was already extensive, had little effect on the fibrous roots except in the top soil. The accessible soil water was quickly depleted and the resulting stress was accompanied by earlier senescence of leaves. The rate of converting intercepted light to crop dry matter was reduced in both treatments. However, the ED treatment was the most detrimental because the amount of light intercepted in the months of highest radiation was greatly reduced owing to the restricted leaf cover. The relative effects on growth are reflected in the final sugar yields which were 8·7, 10·5, 9·9 and 12·0 (±0·30) t/ha in the ED, LD, NI and I treatments respectively.

More of the deep soil water was used in the drought-affected plots (particularly LD) than in the irrigated controls. Maximum depths of water extraction were 140–150 cm in ED and I plots and > 170 cm in LD plots. The highest uptake rates per unit length of root (20–40 μl/cm per day) were measured in the deepest part of the root system. At all depths, uptake rates declined as the soil dried. After correcting for overestimated water use where necessary, the ratios of final dry matter and sugar yields respectively to season-long water use (June–October) were close to 1·4 and 0·8 t/ha per 25 mm for all four treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 421 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, L. H. (1927). Relation of root distribution to cultivation and irrigation. Through the Leaves 15, 21–26.Google Scholar
Brown, K. F. & Biscoe, P. V. (1985). Fibrous root growth and water use of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, W., Legg, B. J., French, B. K., Johnston, A. E., Lawlor, D. W. & Jeffers, W. de C. (1978). A drought experiment using mobile shelters: the effect of drought on barley yield, water use and nutrient uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. (1972). Sugar-Beet Nutrition. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Messem, A. B. (1974). Effects of plant density, irrigation and potassium and sodium fertilisers on sugar beet. II. Influence of soil moisture and weather. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Messem, A. B. (1977). Response of sugar beet to irrigation 1965–1975. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Messem, A. B. (1978). The need for irrigation. Some new views on the evidence. British Sugar Beet Review 46 (2), 5–7.Google Scholar
Food And Agriculture Organization (1977). Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
French, B. K., Long, I. F. & Penman, H. L. (1973). Water use by farm crops. 1. Test of the neutron meter on barley, beans and sugar beet, 1970. Rothamsted Report for 1972, Part 2, pp. 5–42.Google Scholar
Ghariani, S. A. (1981). Impact of variable irrigation water supply on yield-determining parameters and seasonal water-use efficiency of sugar beets. Ph.D. thesis, Univer-sity of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. 2. Soil water relations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K. W., Lawrence, D. K. & Biscoe, P. V. (1982). An understanding of crop physiology in assessing a plant growth regulator on sugar beet. Proceedings of the 33rd Easter School in Agricultural Science, Nottingham. Chemical Manipulation of Crop Growth and Development (ed. McLaren, J. C.), pp. 139–150. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. & Scott, R. K. (1985). The beet crop and its environment. In International Sugar Economic Year-book and Directory 1985 (ed. Ahlfeld, H.), pp. F5–F11. Ratzeburg: F. O. Licht.Google Scholar
Last, P. J., Draycott, A. P., Messem, A. B., & Webb, D. J. (1983). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation on sugar beet at Broom's Barn 1973–1978. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, P. J., Webb, D. J., Bugg, R. B., Bean, K. M. R.,Durrant, M. J. & Jaggard, K. W. (1985). Long-term effects of fertilizers at Broom's Barn 1965–82. Rothamsted Report for 1984, Part 2, 231–249.Google Scholar
Messem, A. B. & Biscoe, P. V. (1984). Influence of weather on the water requirements of sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review 52 (2), 21–24.Google Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Biscoe, P. V., Jaggard, K. W., Scott, R. K. & Draycott, A. P. (1980). Physiological potential for increasing yields for sugar beet. In Opportunities for increasing Crop Yields (ed. Hurd, R. G., Biscoe, P. V. and Dennis, C.), pp. 71–73. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O., Riley, J. & Messem, A. B. (1985). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. III. Leaf expansion in field crops. Annals of Applied Biology 106, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1967). Potential Transpiration. Technical Bulletin 16, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1982). Irrigation, 5th ed.Reference Book 138, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1970). Woburn Irrigation, 1960–8. IV. Design and interpretation. VI. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 69–73; 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1971). Irrigation at Woburn. VII. Rothamsted Report for 1970, Part 2, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Goode, J. E. (1967). Crop Responses to Water at Different Stages of Growth. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Stegman, E. C. & Bauer, A. (1977). Sugar beet response to water stress in sandy soils. Tansactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 20, 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steven, M. D., Biscoe, P. V. & Jaggard, K. W. (1983). Estimation of sugar beet productivity from reflection in the red and infrared spectral bands. International Journal of Remote Sensing 4, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugar Beet Research And Education Committee (1985). Sugar Beet — a Grower's Guide. London: Sugar Beet Research and Education Committee.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. B. & Sinclair, T. R. (1983). Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search. In Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production (ed. Taylor, H. M., Jordan, W. R. and Sinclair, T. R.), pp. 1–27. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. & Klepper, B. (1973). Rooting density and water extraction patterns for corn (Zea mays L). Agronomy Journal 65, 965–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, J. E. (1926). Root Development of Field Crops. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Willatt, S. T. & Taylor, H. M. (1978). Water uptake by soyabean roots as affected by their depth and by soil water content. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar