Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:31:09.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of date of planting on the yield of potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. V. Dyke
G. V. Dyke
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Evidence obtained in the Agricultural Improvement Council Survey of Maincrop Potatoes 1948–50 and in experiments shows that yields in England and Wales are decreased by delay in planting after about 11 April at the rate of about 0·4 tons per acre per week. The effect is rather greater in years with fine springs, and on high-yielding fields.

In Rothamsted experiments the responses to dung and fertilizers were all greatly reduced when planting was delayed; between early April and late May the effects of dung, nitrogen and phosphate were halved, while that of potash was reduced by about 80%. The evidence on the responses of different varieties to early planting in English experiments is contradictory, except for an indication that higher yielding varieties respond better. Data from Craibstone suggest that, if bulk yield is the only criterion, ‘early’ varieties which make rapid growth early in the season have a later optimum planting date than maincrop varieties.

The effect of chitting seed at Craibstone is to increase yields by 1·7 tons per acre for March plantings, and by 2·5 tons per acre for plantings in mid-April and later. There is negligible loss of yield from sprouted seed at Craibstone for plantings delayed up to mid-April, but for unsprouted seed there is evidence of a gain from plantings a month earlier. Sprouted seed planted even as late as 1 May yielded as well as unsprouted planted two months earlier.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1956 , pp. 122 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyd, D. A. & Dyke, G. V. (1950). N.A.A.S. Quart. Rev. no. 10, pp. 47–57.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A. & Lessells, W. J. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, B. M. (1952). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 20, 257–70.Google Scholar
Dyke, G. V. & Avis, P. R. D. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 450–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. H. (1944). Agriculture 50, 557–9.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. N. (1949). Agriculture, 55, 543–4.Google Scholar
Ivins, J. D. & McDermott, N. (1949). Agriculture, 55, 452–3.Google Scholar
Malden, G. (1891). J. R. Agric. Soc. 3rd series, 2, 864–9.Google Scholar
Mukhtar, Singh (1952). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 20, 301–15.Google Scholar
Norfolk Agricultural Station (1952). Farm Guide.Google Scholar
Norfolk Agricultural Station (1953). 44th Annual Rep. 1951–1952.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1928). Scot. J. Agric. 11, 82.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1929). Scot. J. Agric. 12, 69–70.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1930). Scot. J. Agric. 13, 79–80.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1931). Scot. J. Agric. 14, 82–3.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric., Craibstone, Aberdeen (1932). Scot. J. Agric. 15, 79–80.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1933). Scot. J. Agric. 16, 87–9.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1934). Scot. J. Agric. 17, 85–7.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1935). Scot. J. Agric. 18, 64–6.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1936). Scot. J. Agric. 19, 64–5.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1937). Scot. J. Agric. 20, 57–60.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1938). Scot. J. Agric. 21, 169–71.Google Scholar
N. Scot. Coll. Agric, Craibstone, Aberdeen (1939). Scot. J. Agric. 22, 177–9.Google Scholar
Northumberland County Agricultural Experiment Station (1906–11 seriatim). Guide to Experiments.Google Scholar
Rothamsted, . Results of the Field Experiments (1939–1947, 2 and 1948, 1949, 1950).Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1949). Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys (2nd ed. 1953). London: Griffin.Google Scholar