Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:23:41.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of cocoa pod ash on the growth of maize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. K. Adu-Dapaah ,
J. Cobbina  and
E. O. Asare
H. K. Adu-Dapaah
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
J. Cobbina
Affiliation:
Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
E. O. Asare
Affiliation:
Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pot and field experiments were conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture Arable Crops Farm, Kumasi, Ghana during the major rainy season to compare the agronomic efficiency of potassium in cocoa pod ash with that of muriate of potash and to determine the optimum rate of application of cocoa pod ash to maize (Zea mays L. cv. La Posta). Results from the two experiments indicated that the application of 90 kg N/ha and 67 kg P2 O5/ha did not increase shoot dry matter (DM) yield over the control. However, significant increases in DM yield over the control were obtained when N and P were applied together with 56 kg K2O/ha, demonstrating the complementarity of the major nutrient elements N, P and K. Shoot and root DM increased with increasing application of cocoa pod ash. Application of 140 kg/ha cocoa pod as (equivalent to 56 kg K2O/ha) produced the same DM and shoot potassium yields as 56 kg K2O/ha as muriate of potash. The optimum rate of application of cocoa pod ash was 280 kg/ha (112 kg K2O/ha).

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 122 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 31 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ankrah, E. K. (1974). Chemical studies of some plant wastes from Ghana. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25, 1229–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottenie, A. (1980). Soil and Plant Testing as a Basis of Fertilizer Recommendations. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Egunjobi, A. O. (1975). On the possible utilization of discarded cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) pod husks as fertilizer and nematicide. In Proceedings of the 5th International Cocoa Research Conference (Eds Atanda, A. O., Olaniran, Y. A. O., Omotosho, T. I., Youdebwei, A., Adelusi, J. O. & Daramola, A. M.), pp. 541–547. lbadan, Nigeria: Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria.Google Scholar
Egunjobi, A. O. & Larinde, M. A. (1975). Nematodes and maize growth in Nigeria. II. Effects of some amendments on populations of maize (Zea mays L.) in lbadan. Nematologia Mediterranea 3, 65–73.Google Scholar
Munson, R. D. (1968). Potassium builds corn quality. Better Crops Plant Food 52, 4–5.Google Scholar
Pretty, K. M. & Stangel, P. J. (1985). Current and future use of world potassium. In Potassium in Agriculture (Ed. Munson, R. D.), pp. 99–128. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Owusu-Domfeh, K. (1972). The future of cocoa and its byproducts in the feeding of livestock. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 5, 57–64.Google Scholar
Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L. & Beaton, J. D. (1985). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers (4th Edn). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar