Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:13:43.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of barley supplements on the voluntary intake and digestion of low quality roughages by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. S. Lamb  and
J. Eadie
C. S. Lamb
Affiliation:
The Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
J. Eadie
Affiliation:
The Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Oat straw, timothy straw and two field-cured hays (43·8, 47·3, 52·0 and 56·0% organic matter digestibility (OMD) and 0·56, 0·75, 1·00 and 1·41% N respectively) were fed ad libitum together with 0, 235, 470 and 705 g D.M. of rolled barley to 5-year-old North Country Cheviot wethers in four 4x4 Latin square designs (Expt 1). In an attendant study (Expt 2) of conditions with in the rumen four rumen fistulated wethers were offered daily 0, 200, 400 and 600 g D.M. of rolled barley with ad libitum hay (54·3% OMD, 1·45% N), also following a Latin square design.

The voluntary intake of two of the hays (54·3 and 56·0% OMD) decreased progressively as the barley increased. Intakes of the other roughages were slightly increased when the lowest amount of barley was fed. For each roughage total organic-matter intake and the OMD of the ration increased progressively with increasing amount of barley consumed. No associative effects of barley on the OMD of the roughages were demonstrated. The acid-detergent fibre (ADF) digestibility of diets comprising the highest amount of barley with the oat straw and the field-cured hay of lowest N content were significantly lower than that of the respective all-roughage feeds. In Expt 2 the intake of increasing amounts of barley significantly reduced rumen pH, the molar proportion of acetic acid and the disappearance of hay and hay ADF from terylene bags within the rumen, while volatile fatty acid concentration and the molar proportion of butyric acid increased.

Multiple regressions were obtained relating the change in roughage intake to the amount of barley fed and the digestibility and chemical composition of the roughages. The equation with the least error, explaining 88% of the variation, was Y= 30·561 — 0·615C — 21·453N±3·69, where Y is the change in roughage intake as a percentage of the intake of roughage fed alone, Cis barley intake as g OM/W0·73 and N is the nitrogen content of the roughage.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 235 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. & Wilson, B. S. (1961). The regulation of food intake by sheep. Animal Production 3, 51–61.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wilson, R. S. (1963). The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production. Animal Production 5, 27–42.Google Scholar
Briggs, P. K., Hogan, J. P. & Reid, R. L. (1957). The effect of volatile fatty acids, lactic acid and ammonia on rumen pH in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 674–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1966). The effect of concentrates on the rate of disappearance of digesta from the alimentary tract of cows given hay. Journal of Dairy Research 33, 13–23.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Murdoch, J. C. (1966). The effect of concentrates on the voluntary intake of roughage by cows. Journal of Dairy Research 33, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappel, G. L. M. & Fontenot, J. P. (1968). Effect of level of readily-available carbohydrates in purified sheep rations on cellulose digestibility and nitrogen utilization. Journal of Animal Science 27, 1709–1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. London: Crosby, Lockwood and Son.Google Scholar
Crabtree, J. R. & Williams, G. L. (1971). The voluntary intake and utilization of roughage-concentrate diets by sheep: 1. Concentrate supplements for hay and straw. Animal Production 13, 71–82.Google Scholar
Donefer, E., Lloyd, L. E. & Crampton, E. W. (1963). Effect of varying alfalfa: barley ratios on energy intake and volatile fatty acid production by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 22, 425–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadie, J. M., Hyldgaard-Jensen, J., Mann, S. O., Reid, R. S. & Whitelaw, F. G. (1970). Observations on the microbiology and biochemistry of the rumen in cattle given different quantities of a pelleted barley. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 157–177.Google Scholar
Eng, K. S., Riewe, M. E., Craig, J. H. & Smith, J. C. (1964). Rate of passage of concentrate and roughage through the digestive tract of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 23, 1129–1132.Google Scholar
Fick, K. R., Ammerman, C. B., McGowan, C. H., Loggins, P. E. & Cornell, J. A. (1973). Influence of supplemental energy and biuret nitrogen on the utilization of low quality roughage by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 36, 137–143.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, C. S. & Armstrong, D. G. (1966). Further studies on the effect of supplementing roughages with Rumevite. Annual report of the University of Newcastle- upon-Tyne School of Agriculture, 1966, p. 26.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. & Thomas, P. C. (1972). Energy metabolism in sheep receiving diets of barley, hay and flaked maize. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31, 49A. (Abstr.)Google ScholarPubMed
Osbourn, D. F., Terry, R. A., Cammell, S. B. & Outen, G. E. (1970). Some aspects of feeding supplements of maize meal and sodium bicarbonate upon the digesta of forage cellulose by sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 29, 12A–13A. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Playne, M. J. (1969). Effects of supplements on intake of Spear grass and Townsville lucerne hay. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 9, 393–399.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. & Gunn, R. G. (1969). Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 451–454.Google Scholar
Terry, R. A., Tilley, J. M. A. & Outen, G. E. (1969). Effect of pH on cellulose digestion under in vitro conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 20, 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A., Terry, R. A., Deriaz, R. E. & Outen, G. E. (1964). Studies of herbage digestibility using the in vitro method. Experiments in progress, Grassland Research Institute, Hurley 16, 64–67.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H., Reed, W. D. C. & Elliott, R. C. (1965). The effect of season and of supplementary feeding on the rumen contents of African cattle grazing subtropical herbage. II. pH values and concentration and proportions of volatile fatty acids. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1965). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46, 829–835.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar