Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:10:56.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digestion and retention time of stained food in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. Fadlalla
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
R. N. B. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB

Summary

The suitability of stained food and [103Ru]phenanthroline-treated food as markers for measuring dietary retention time was examined in sheep. The digestibility of oat husk, assessed by incubation of samples contained in nylon bags in the rumen, was greatly depressed by staining with brilliant green, and slightly depressed by basic fuschsin. The latter effect appeared largely to be due to boiling rather than the stain itself.

When milled hay treated with both basic fuschsin and [103Ru]phenanthroline was introduced into the rumen, the mean retention time estimated with the stain was about 40% longer than that estimated with [103Ru]phenanthroline.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. (1956). The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. 1. Studies on adult animals fed on hay and concentrates. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coombe, J. B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). Passage of digesta through the intestines of the sheep. Retention times in the small and large intestines. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 325338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dafaalla, B. F. M. (1980). The effects of the physical form of hay on digestion and retention time in sheep. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1985). Removal of digesta components from the rumen of steers determined by sieving techniques and fluid, particulate and microbial markers. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 347362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, W. C. & Huston, J. E. (1967). Caution concerning the stained particle technique for determining gastro-intestinal retention time of dietary residues. Journal of Dairy Science 50, 19961999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. C. & Huston, J. E. (1968). 144Ce-144Pr as a particulate digesta flow marker in ruminants. Journal of Nutrition 95, 6778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. C, Matis, J. H. & Lascano, C. (1979). Quantitating ruminal turnover. Federation Proceedings 38, 27022706.Google ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G. J. & Griffiths, D. A. (1978). Behaviour of solute and particle markers in the stomach of sheep given a concentrate diet. British Journal of Nutrition 40, 7182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1977). A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 645650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, T. N., Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1971). Use of 103Ru-labelled tris (1, 10-phenanthroline) Ruthenium (II) chloride as a marker in digestion studies with sheep. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 22, 301308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, A. C. I. (1981). Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds. Nutritional Abstracts and Reviews B 51, 789820.Google Scholar