Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:24:01.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences amongst breeds of sheep in food requirements for maintenance and live-weight change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. M. Doney  and
A. J. F. Russel
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, 29 Lauder Road, Edinburgh, 9
A. J. F. Russel
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, 29 Lauder Road, Edinburgh, 9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a series of experiments, each of 6 weeks' duration, non-pregnant Romney, Scottish Blackface and Tasmanian fine-wool Merino ewes were individually penned in an outdoor environment and allocated a constant ration within a range from 8 to 30 g of a standard dried-grass pellet per kg live weight. Maintenance requirements were calculated from the regression of live-weight change per unit weight on intake per unit weight. Comparable values for the three breeds were computed as 8·4, 9·2 and 14·0 g DOM (digestible organic matter)/kg/day for Romney, Blackface and Merino respectively, the latter being significantly higher than for the two British breeds. Estimates of requirements per unit change in live weight, after allowing for maintenance, were 5·1, 4·6 and 3·0 g DOM/g live-weight change for the three breeds. Methods of estimation of energy requirements and the reasons for differences between breeds are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 1968 , pp. 343 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Requirements of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1962). The energy requirements of sheep for maintenance and gain. I. Pen fed sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, J. M. (1967). The effect of inbreeding on food consumption and utilisation by sheep. Anim. Prod. 9, 359–64.Google Scholar
Garett, W. N., Meyer, J. H. & Lofgreen, G. P. (1959). The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 528–47.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. & Drake-Brockman, R. M. (1961). The feed intake of grazing cattle. II. The influence of size of animal on feed intake. Anim. Prod. 3, 251–60.Google Scholar
Jefferies, B. C. (1961). Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasm. J. Agric. 32, 19–21.Google Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. (1961). The relative effects of environment and live-weight upon the feed requirements of sheep. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 21, 92–108.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. & Pullar, J. D. (1963). Estimates of the energy required for maintenance by adult sheep. I. Housed sheep. Anim. Prod. 5, 1–9.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. & Holmes, W. (1968). The effect of level of feeding on the digestibility of feeds by ruminants. Anim. Prod. 10, 232–3 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. & Gtjnn, R. G. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. & Doney, J. M. (1969). Observations on the use of plasma-free fatty acid concentrations in the determination of maintenance requirements of sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. (In press.)Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. & Young, G. B. (1966). Variation in growth and efficiency in twin cattle with live weight and food intake controlled. J. agric. Set., Camb. 66, 67–85.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Hendricks, W. A. (1953). Energy requirements of beef calves for maintenance and growth. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull., p. 1071.Google Scholar
Wood, T. B. & Capstick, J. W. (1926). The maintenance requirement of the adult sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 16, 325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar