Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:49:22.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The determination of the best method for estimating potato yields, together with a further note on the influence of size of seed on the character and yield of the potato. III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Extract

The work undertaken in 1922 was in the main a continuation of that done in 1920 and 1921, the results of which have already been published, and the object of which had been to determine the relation between the size of the seed tuber-sets and their resultant crop, and the further relation between the amount of heavy ware in the crop and the size of the seed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1) Appleman, . “Special Growth-Promoting Substances and Correlation.” Science, N.S 48, No. 1239, p. 319, 1918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2) Loeb, J.The Law Controlling the Quantity and the Rate of Regeneration.” Proc. Nat. Acad. of Science, 4, p. 117, 1918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(3) Salaman, Redcliffe N.The Influence of Size and Character of Seed on the Yield of Potatoes (I).” Journ. of Ministry of Agriculture, 28, No. 1, 1921.Google Scholar
(4) Salaman, Redcliffe N.The Influence of Size and Character of Seed on the Yield of Potatoes (II).” Journ. of Agric. Science, 12, Pt. II, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Stewart, F. C. “Further Studies on the Effect of Missing Hills in Potato Fields and on the Variation in the Yield of Potato Plants from Halves of the Same Seed Tuber.” New York Agric. Exp. Stat. Bull. No. 489, 10 1921.Google Scholar
(6) Wood, T. B. and Stratton, F. J. M.The Interpretation of Experimental Results.” Journ. Agric. Science, 3, p. 417, 1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar