Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:19:13.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competition and productivity in crop mixtures: some properties of productive intercrops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

PETER A. JOLLIFFE
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Canada
FREDRICK M. WANJAU
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Canada

Abstract

Inverse yield–density relationships were used to evaluate how competitive balances in mixed plant species associations may influence productivity, as measured by three indices : Relative Yield Total (RYT), Relative Land Output (RLO), and Total Land Output (TLO). Parameters of the inverse relationships, which express competitive influences and plant growth potential in the absence of competition, were incorporated into expressions used to predict RYT, RLO and TLO. Initial parameter values were derived from 25 experiments on binary species mixtures, and parameter values were systematically varied over a 100-fold range. Response to parameter manipulation was also investigated in five specific binary associations representing a broad range of relative mixture productivity. As indicated by RLO or RYT, and in accord with ecological concepts of niche differentiation, high productivity of mixtures relative to monocultures occurred if between-species competition was low. As indicated by TLO, the total combined productivity of the mixed species was enhanced by higher potential growth per plant in the absence of competition. Lower within- and between-species competition also increased TLO. There was a significant positive correlation between RYT and RLO. Relative and total measures of mixture productivity, however, showed different responses to parameter manipulation, and were not correlated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)