Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:30:47.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the effects of autumn and spring sowing date on growth and yield of combining peas (Pisum sativutn L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. N. Silim ,
P. D. Hebblethwaite  and
M. C. Heath
S. N. Silim
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD
P. D. Hebblethwaite
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD
M. C. Heath
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments were conducted between 1978 and 1981 to investigate the effect of autumn and spring sowing on emergence, winter survival, growth and yield of combining peas (varieties ‘Frimas’, ‘Filby’ and ‘Vedette’). Effects of growth regulator PP 333 (Paclobutrazol, ICI pic) application and defoliation on winter survival of Filby were also investigated. Field emergence of autumn-sown Frimas (winter hardy) was less than Vedette or Filby but percentage winter survival was greater. PP 333 application, but not defoliation, increased percentage winter survival of Filby sown in September. Total dry-matter production and photosynthetic area of autumn- compared with spring-sown crops varied considerably between seasons. Yield data indicated that autumn-sown crops produce similar seed yields to spring sowings when winter survival is adequate. November sowings matured 2–4 weeks before March-sown crops, depending on variety and season. Optimum sowing dates were mid-November and early March. Large seed-yield reductions occurred when sowing was delayed until mid-April.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 35 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acikgoz, E. (1982). Cold tolerance and its association with seedling morphology and chemical composition in annual forage legumes. I. Field peas (Pisum salivum ssp. arvense L. Poir). Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung 88, 2, 118–126.Google Scholar
Batch, J. J. (1981). Recent developments in growth regulators for cereal crops. Outlook on Agriculture 10, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becwar, M. R. & Bagett, J. R. (1978). Winter survival of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Line and cultivars grown with flat culture and raised beds. HortScience 13, 288–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, V. R. (1926). The influence of temperature upon the growth and yield of garden peas. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 23, 162–168.Google Scholar
Cousin, R. (1976). Amelioration genetique du pois d'hiver. Annales de VAmelioration des Plantes 26, 235–263.Google Scholar
Dowkeb, B. D. (1969). Field methods of assessing winter hardiness in pea. Euphytica 18, 398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, H. F., Oemkod, D. P., Mauher, A. R. & Stanfield, B. (1966). Response of peas to environment. 1. Planting dates and location. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 46, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froggatt, P. J., Thomas, W. D. & Batch, J. J. (1981). The value of lodging control in winter wheat as exemplified by the growth regulator PP 333. In British Plant Growth Regulator Qroup Monograph No. 7, Opportunities for Manipulation of Cereal Productivity (ed. Hawkins, A. F. and Jeffcoat, B. J.), pp. 71–87.Google Scholar
Hebblethwaite, P. D. (1978). A first look at wintorhardy peas. Arable Farming, 02 1978, pp. 63–65.Google Scholar
Hedley, C. L. & Ambrose, M. J. (1981). Designing ‘leafless’ plants for improving yields of the dried pea crop. Advances in Agronomy 34, 255–277.Google Scholar
Kruger, S. N. (1973). Effect of time of planting on the seasonal yields of Pisum sativum L. Queensland Journal of Agriculture and Animal Science 30, 25–38.Google Scholar
Mabkarian, D. & Anderson, R. L. (1966). The inheritance of winter hardiness in Pisum. I. Euphytica 15, 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbourn, G. M. & Hardwick, R. C. (1968). The growth of vining peas. 1. The effect of time of sowing. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Processors and Growers Research Organisation (1981). Descriptive list of varieties of combining peas. Advisory leaflet No. 4, 6 pp. Processors and Growers Research Organisation, Peterborough, England.Google Scholar
Processors and Growers Research Organisation (1982). Notes on Growing Combining Peas, 11pp. Processors and Growers Research Organisation, Peterborough, England.Google Scholar
Proctor, J. M. (1963). An experiment to determine the effects of date of sowing on the yield and quality of harvesting peas. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Williams, J. B. (1967). The effect of irrigation on pea crops grown at different plant densities. Journal of Horticultural Science 42, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silim, S. N. (1982). Sowing date and water stress in Pisum sativum.Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham. 206 pp.Google Scholar
Vulstekeg, G. (1974). The importance of sowing date in peas for harvesting dry. Field Crop Abstracts (1975) 28, No. 6506.Google Scholar