Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:29:46.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative studies of meat VII. A comparison between Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. H. Callow
E. H. Callow
Affiliation:
Low Temperature Research Station, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An investigation concerning the weights twenty-four beef steers (three breeds—Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesians—on four planes nutrition), their grades, weights of organs, carcasses, tissues, etc., together with the chemical composition of their muscular and fatty tissues has been carried out.

2. The resultant data have been used to calculate—mainly by an analysis of variance—the effect of breed and level of nutrition. Only statistically significant differences are dealt with in this summary.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 1961 , pp. 265 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bate-Smith, E. C. (1942). Chem. & Ind. 61, 373.Google Scholar
Brookes, A. J. & Vincett, L. S. (1950). J. Roy. Agric. Soc. 3, 99.Google Scholar
Brookes, A. J. (1951). J. Fmrs' Cl., Lond., 5, 64.Google Scholar
Brookes, A. J. & Hodges, J. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 78.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 1.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. and Searle, S. R. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1960). Private communication.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P. (1959). Nature, Lond., 184, 1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 276, 387, 511.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 1.Google Scholar
Pálsson, H. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 544.Google Scholar