Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:11:30.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cold tolerance and winter hardiness in Lolium perenne: II. Influence of light and temperature during growth and hardening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding StationAberystwyth
J. P. Cooper
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding StationAberystwyth
E. L. Breese
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding StationAberystwyth

Summary

In the first paper of this series it was shown that Lolium perenne material required hardening periods involving low, but above freezing, temperatures before frost tolerance was achieved. The present experiments show that the light conditions during the hardening and prehardening periods are also important. At both stages a reduction in total light energy reduced subsequent cold tolerance but the relative effects of light intensity and photoperiod differed between the prehardening and hardening treatments. Thus low light input during the hardening period at 2 CC reduced cold tolerance most when given at higher intensities over shorter days (8 h) while during the prehardening growing period at 20 °C the reduction was greatest when the lower light input was given at low intensity over longer days (16 h).

Varieties of different climatic origins reacted differentially to the treatments. The Mediterranean variety Fano was particularly adversely affected by low light intensities during hardening and also benefited from higher temperatures during the prehardening growing period. With higher light intensities and higher growth temperatures this Mediterranean variety approached the more northern material in cold tolerance; but as a corollary it was clear that the N. European variety Veja was able to harden under lower light conditions, and lower growing temperatures. The varieties Melle and S. 321 from intermediate latitudes, were intermediate in response.

Although water soluble carbohydrate content was increased during the hardening period, except at the lowest light intensity (2·9 W/m2), no simple relationship between the WSC content and the cold tolerance of the different varieties could be detected.

The results provide a useful guide to the pre-treatments necessary to discriminate between varieties for cold tolerance in such a way that the results can be correlated with field performance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breese, E. L. & Foster, C. A. (1971). Breeding for increased winter hardiness in perennial ryegrasses. Rep. Welsh Pl. Breed. Stn for 1970, pp. 7786.Google Scholar
Eagles, C. F. (1967). The effect of temperature on vegetative growth in climatic races of Dactylis glomerata in controlled environments. Ann. Bot. NS 31, 31–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, J. (1956). The hardiness of plants. Ann. Soc. Agron. Mon. Vol. vi, 5189. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzetti, F., Tyler, B. F., Cooper, J. P. & Breese, E. L. (1971). Cold toleranee and winter hardiness in Lolium perenne. I. Development of screening techniques for cold tolerance and survey of geographical variation. J. agric. Sci., Cainb. 76, 199209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. (1964). Winter injury and the survival of forage plants. Herb. Abstr. 34, 203–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. J. & Wright, A. J. (1972). Principles and problems in grass breeding. Rep. PI. Breed. Inst., Cambridge for 1971, 3167.Google Scholar
Treharne, K. J. & Eagles, C. F. (1970). Effect of temperature on photosynthetic activity of climatic races of Dactylis glomerata. Photosynthetica 4, 107–17.Google Scholar
Yemm, E. W. & Willis, A. J. (1954). The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57, 508–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed