Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T23:58:49.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A census of an acre of corn (by sampling)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. L. Engledow
Affiliation:
(Plant Breeding Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge.)

Extract

In human society, density of population is marked by striking variations. With these are associated geographic, social, and economic differences. Among the plant populations of our fields occur gradations of spacing or density which, by broad analogy, suggest problems akin to those arising from density differences in human populations. It is necessary to do no more than walk the length of one of the drill rows in a field of young corn to appreciate the general situation. The facts are patent some five weeks after sowing when the emergence of the seedlings is almost completed. Side by side with a foot length of drill in which are thirty plants may be another foot with only three. Complete gaps of 2 feet or more are to be found in places: in others the plants are almost too numerous to count. In every field of corn, even at this early stage, the density or closeness of the plants in the drills is extremely irregular. As the season advances various influences induce irregular reductions in the number of plants. Vermin and disease take sporadic toll. Competition between plant and plant with death or effective disablement of the weaker has some effect. Its intensity at any point is mainly determined by the density or closeness of the plants. By May, for winter corn, a static condition has generally been reached. Plants living then are likely to contribute grain and straw to the harvest. Among these survivors are great differences in spacing. This may be readily appreciated by uplifting and counting the roots in sample 1-foot lengths of drill on a stubble field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 183 note 1 Journ. Agric. Sci. 14, 67.Google Scholar

Page 184 note 1 Journ. Agric. Sci. 15, 134.Google Scholar

Page 187 note 1 Journ. Agric. Sci. 15, 135–6.Google Scholar