Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T04:44:03.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breed and sex effects on the development, distribution of muscle, fat and bone, and the partition of fat in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Fortin ,
J. D. Wood  and
O. P. Whelehan
A. Fortin
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Institute of Food Research, Bristol Laboratory, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY
J. D. Wood
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Institute of Food Research, Bristol Laboratory, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY
O. P. Whelehan
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Institute of Food Research, Bristol Laboratory, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Dissection data from 341 carcasses collected over a period of 7 years at the Institute of Food Research, Bristol (Large White, 138 entire males and 112 females; Pietrain, 41 entire males and 31 females; Iron Age (European Wild Pig × Tamworth), 8 entire males and 11 females) were used to examine the growth of muscle, fat and bone in joints relative to the corresponding total tissue in the side, and the growth of the fat depots relative to total side fat.

The musculature of Iron Age pigs was early maturing, as indicated by a particularly slow growth of pelvic limb and fast growth of neck and thorax muscles relative to total side muscle. As a consequence, Iron Age pigs had a lower percentage of pelvic limb and a higher percentage of neck and thorax muscles than the other breeds. Pietrains had proportionately the heaviest pelvic limb muscles, a result which was apparently independent of the overriding effect of maturity. However, considering the large difference in body shape (conformation) between Pietrain and Iron Age pigs, the differences in muscle weight distribution were small. Entire males had faster growing and heavier neck and thorax muscles than females. This was considered to be due to the effects of sex hormones. Entire males had proportionately less muscle in the pelvic limb.

Within carcass fat, the order of increasing growth rate relative to total side fat was intermuscular fat <; subcutaneous fat <; perirenal-retroperitoneal fat. Pietrain and Iron Age pigs had higher relative growth rates for subcutaneous fat and lower relative growth rates for intermuscular fat than Large Whites, an indication of earlier maturity in carcass fat development. This was reflected in Iron Age pigs, but not Pietrains, in a particularly heavy weight of subcutaneous fat and light weight of intermuscular fat. Within the subcutaneous and intermuscular fat depots, the highest allometric growth coefficients were generally observed in the forequarter. There were no consistent breed effects on the distribution of subcutaneous fat whereas, in the intermuscular fat depot, Iron Age pigs had less fat in the earlier-maturing thoracic limb, and lumbar and abdominal joint. At the same weight of total side fat (8·80 kg), entire male Pietrains and Large Whites had more intermuscular and less subcutaneous fat than females. There was no sex difference in fat partition in Iron Age pigs.

In all breeds, bone in the pelvic limb had the slowest relative growth. Similarly, the femur and the tibia-fibula were the two slowest growing bones of the four major limb bones examined. Otherwise, there was no consistent pattern of relative growth throughout the skeleton. Breed effects on relative growth within the skeleton and on bone distribution were small and considered to be of little commercial significance. Pietrains had the highest muscle: bone ratio in each of the four anatomical joints. Entire males and females had a similar relative growth and distribution of bones. Females had consistently higher muscle:bone ratios.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 141 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, P. J. & Carpenter, E. M. (1976). A Review of Consumer Attitudes and Requirements for Meat. Report No. 23, Department of Agricultural Marketing, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. & Liboriussen, T. (1978 a). Growth of bovine tissues. 2. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27, 51–61.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. & Liboriussen, T. (1978 b). Growth of bovine tissues. 3. Genetic influences on pattern of fat growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27, 63–69.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Butterfield, R. M. (1976). New Concepts of Cattle Growth. New York: Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. & Williams, D. R. (1977). Pig Carcass Evaluation – Measurements of Composition Using Anatomical Dissection. Memorandum, Agricultural Research Council, Meat Research Institute, no. 33, 1–16.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. & Wood, J. D. (1982). The partition of body fat in British Friesian and Jersey steers. Animal Production 35, 253–262.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Thompson, J. M. & Reddacliff, K. J. (1985). Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. Animal Production 40, 129–134.Google Scholar
Davies, A. S. (1974). A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight. 2. Growth changes in muscle distribution. Animal Production 19, 377–387.Google Scholar
Davies, A. S. (1975). A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight. 3. Growth changes in bone distribution. Animal Production 20, 45–49.Google Scholar
Davies, A. S., Pearson, G. & Carr, J. R. (1980). The carcass composition of male, castrated male and female pigs resulting from two levels of feeding. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. S. & Pryor, W. J. (1977). Growth changes in the distribution of dissectable and intramuscular fat in pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1984). Diet and Cardiovascular Disease. Report on Health and Social Subjects No. 28. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Desmoulin, B. & Bonneau, M. (1979). Production de viandes de pores mâles entiers ou castrés: effcacité alimentaire et composition corporelle chez les races hypermusclées. Annales de Zootechnie 28, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, A. V. (1983). Variation in saleable meat yield and carcass value, as revealed by a U.K. method of commercial cutting, with particular regard to the comparison between bulls and steers. In Comparative Retail Value of Beef Carcasses (ed. Fisher, A. V.), pp. 22–32. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Eur 8465 EN.Google Scholar
Fortin, A., Wood, J. D. & Whelehan, O. P. (1987). Breed and sex effects on the development and proportions of muscle, fat and bone in pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goenaga, P. R. & Carden, A. E. (1979). A comparison of tissue weight distribution in Landrace, Hampshire and Duroc Jersey pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health and Welfare Canada-Santé Et Bien-Être Social Canada (1976). Report of the Committee on Diet and Cardiovascular Disease. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Henson, J. (1978). Iron Age pigs. Ark 9, 59–60.Google Scholar
Jones, S. D. M., Richmond, R. J., Price, M. A. & Berg, R. T. (1980). Effects of breed and sex on the patterns of fat deposition and distribution in swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Harrington, G. (1982). Carcass Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing. London: Granada.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. & Evans, D. G. (1979). The effects of genotype, sex and feeding regimen on pigs carcass development. 2. Tissue weight distribution and fat partition between depots. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J. & Evans, D. G. (1981). The value of shape as a predictor of carcass composition in pigs from different breeding companies. Animal Production 33, 313–318.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). Growth and development of the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characteristics. 1. Age changes in growth and development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 30, 292–343.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission (1983). Unusual Fat Distribution in Pigs. Meat and Marketing Technical Notes No. 1, pp. 5–7. Bletchley, Milton Keynes: Meat and Livestock Commission.Google Scholar
Richmond, R. J. & Berg, R. T. (1971 a). Muscle growth and distribution in swine as influenced by live weight, breed, sex and ration. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, R. J. & Berg, R. T. (1971 b). Fat distribution in swine as influenced by live weight, breed, sex and ration. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Walstra, P. (1980). Growth and carcass composition from birth to maturity in relation to feeding level and sex in Dutch Landrace pigs. Mededelingen Land-bouwhogeschool, Wageningen 80 (4), 1–206.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D. (1984). Fat deposition and the quality of fat tissue in meat animals. In Fats in Animal Nutrition (ed. Wiseman, J.), pp. 407–435. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. D., Fisher, A. V. & Whelehan, O. P. (1986). The effects of a combined androgenic-oestrogenic anabolic agent in steers and bulls. 2. Muscle weight distribution, partition of body fat and carcass value. Animal Production 42, 213–222.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D. & Riley, J. E. (1982). Comparison of boars and castrates for bacon production. 1. Growth data, and carcass and joint composition. Animal Production 35, 55–63.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D., Whelehan, O. P., Ellis, M., Smith, W. C. & Laird, R. (1983). Effects of selection for low backfat thickness in pigs on the sites of tissue deposition in the body. Animal Production 36, 389–397.Google Scholar