Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:06:49.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breed and seasonal differences in quantities of lipids on skin surface and hair in cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Y. S. Pan
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Genetics, F. D. McMaster Field Station, C.S.I.R.O., Mail Bag, Liverpool, N.S.W., 2170, Australia

Summary

Differences between Sahiwals and Jerseys and between summer and winter in the quantities of lipids on the skin surface and on hair were studied.

Sahiwals had significantly greater quantities of lipids on both the skin surface and hair in summer and in winter. In both breeds, there were significantly greater amounts of lipids on the skin surface and on hair in winter. In both breeds a significantly greater quantity of lipids was present on hair than on skin in winter but not in summer.

Jerseys had greater weight of hair/unit area of skin than Sahiwals in both summer and winter. There was no significant correlation between the amount of lipids on hair and the weight of hair.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, T. E., Pan, Y. S. & Hayman, R. H. (1963). The effect of feeding on evaporative heat loss and body temperature in Zebu and Jersey heifers. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtenshaw, J. M. L. (1938). The mortality of hemolytic streptococcus on the skin and other surfaces. J. Hyg., Camb. 38, 575.Google ScholarPubMed
Burtenshaw, J. M. L. (1942). The mechanism of self-disinfection of the human skin and its appendages. J. Hyg., Camb. 42, 184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermann, F., Prose, P. H. & Sulzberger, M. B. (1953). Studies on the ether soluble substances in human skin. J. invest. Derm. 21, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewetson, R. W. (1968). Resistance to cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. II. The inheritance of resistance to experimental infestations. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewetson, R. W. & Nolan, J. (1968). Resistance of cattle to cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. I. The development of resistance to experimental infestations. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kligman, A. M. (1963). The uses of sebum. In Advances in Biology of Skin, vol. IV, p. 110. (Eds. Montagna, M., Ellis, R. A. and Silver, A. F.). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kligman, A. M. & Ginsberg, D. (1950). Immunity of the adult scalp to infection with Microsporum audouini. J. invest. Derm. 14, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kligman, A. M. & Shelley, W. B. (1958). An investigation of the biology of the human sebaceous gland. J. invest. Derm. 30, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillsbury, D. M. & Rebell, G. C. (1952). The bacterial flora of the skin. J. invest. Derm. 18, 173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resell, G. C., Pillsbury, D. M., Saint, Phalle M. & Ginsburg, D. (1950). Factors affecting the rapid disappearance of bacteria placed on the skin. J. invest. Derm. 14, 247.Google Scholar
Rhoad, A. O. (1942). A scale of heat tolerance for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1, 85.Google Scholar
Ricketts, C. R., Squire, J. R., Topley, E. & Lilly, H. A. (1951). Human skin lipids with particular reference to the self-sterilizing power of skin. Clin. Sci. 10, 89.Google Scholar
Riek, R. F. (1962). Studies on the reactions of animals to infestation with ticks. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, S., Smiljanic, A., Shaparo, A. L. & Weitkamp, A. W. (1947). The spontaneous cure of tinea capitis in puberty. J. invest. Derm. 8, 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelmire, J. B. (1959). Some interrelations between sebum, sweat and skin surface. J. invest. Derm. 32, 471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulzberger, M. B. (1960). The biology and functions of the skin surface. Jap. J. Derm. 70, 105.Google Scholar