Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:16:47.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body composition of young sheep: I. Body composition in merino and Border Leicester × Merino hoggets in relation to and at common empty body weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. R. Gharaybeh ,
W. R. McManus ,
G. W. Arnold  and
M. L. Dudzinski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Flocks of 9-month-old Merino and Border Leicester & Merino sheep were sampled over the full range of body weights present within flocks. Six pairs of ewes and wethers of equal body weight were taken. The sheep were weighed and slaughtered after a 36 h fast. Total weights of blood, skin, head, feet, internal organs and carcasses were obtained for each animal. Each component was analysed for ash, crude protein, ether extract and total energy. Half of each carcass was dissected into bone, muscle, fat and waste.

The compositions of the sheep were compared by regression analyses of weights of body components on empty body weight (EBW) between the four groups and by means of percentages of EBW. There were highly significant linear relationships between both fresh and dry weights of body components, carcass components, and chemical components with EBW; moisture content was not related to EBW. Rates of change with EBW in weights of body components, or in amounts of ash, crude protein, ether extract and energy were the same for all groups of sheep with the exceptions of bone and skin ether extract (EE) weight. However, intercepts of regression lines frequently differed, indicating that body composition differed between groups at the same EBW.

All groups had the same dry weight of blood, internal organs and muscle, weight of ether extract, and total energy in the whole body at the same EBW. Border Leicester × Merinos had lighter skins with less wool, but their carcass weights were higher than Merinos. There were other differences between breeds in the chemical composition of individual components. Wethers had heavier head + feet weights and carcass bone than had ewes. There were also some sex differences in chemical composition of body components. In general, there were fewer sex than breed differences in body composition. The breed differences cannot be explained on the basis of early and later maturing types.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 65 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnicoat, L. & Shorland, F. B. (1952). New Zealand lamb and mutton. II. Chemical composition of edible tissues. N.Z. Sci. Tech. 33A, (No. 5) 16–23.Google Scholar
Barton, R. A. & Kirton, A. H. (1958). Carcass weight as an index of carcass components with particular reference to fat. J. agric. Sci., Oamb. 50, 331–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharaybeh, H. R. (1966). Body composition and energy storage in meat and wool breeds of sheep subjected to various stocking rate and grazing management practices. Ph.D. Thesis, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Gharaybeh, H. R., Arnold, G. W., Mcmanus, W. R. & Dudzinski, M. L. (1966). Prediction of body composition in live animals. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6, 284–90.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H. & Barton, R. A. (1958). Study of some indices of the chemical composition of lamb carcasses. J. agric. Sci., Gamb. 51, 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. (1963). Carcass composition and appraisal of meat animals. Tech. Conf. Melbourne, 1963. C.S.I.R.O.Google Scholar